FXG vs. GXPS
FXG (First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund) and GXPS (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - FXG tracks the StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index while GXPS tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FXG returned 5.04% vs 9.88% for GXPS. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FXG charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GXPS.
Performance
FXG vs. GXPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXG achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than GXPS's 10.64% return.
FXG
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- 6M
- -1.21%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 5.04%
- 3Y*
- 2.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 4.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.12%
GXPS
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- 6M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 9.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $695.75K | $660.92K | $780.49K | |
| $502.26K | $508.75K | $741.91K |
FXG vs. GXPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund | 8.56% | -4.33% |
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 10.64% | -1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXG and GXPS is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FXG and GXPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXG vs. GXPS — Risk / Return Rank
FXG
GXPS
FXG vs. GXPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXG | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.12 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 1.08 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.80 | 2.04 | -1.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXG vs. GXPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXG drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than GXPS's maximum drawdown of -9.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXG and GXPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXG | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.69% | -9.20% | -29.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -9.20% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.05% | -4.96% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.04% | -4.13% | -1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.30% | 4.85% | +1.45% |
Volatility
FXG vs. GXPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) is 5.00%, while Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that FXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GXPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXG | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 5.59% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.69% | 12.26% | -1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.90% | 15.00% | -1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 14.86% | -1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 14.86% | +0.16% |
FXG vs. GXPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXG has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPS's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXG vs. GXPS - Dividend Comparison
FXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than GXPS's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund | 2.35% | 2.83% | 1.70% | 1.41% | 1.83% | 1.38% | 1.41% | 1.63% | 2.31% | 1.34% | 1.72% | 1.67% |
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 1.25% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXG and GXPS have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXPS has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to FXG (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXG dropped -38.69% vs GXPS's -9.20%.
On 1-year performance, GXPS leads with 9.88% vs 5.04% for FXG. On fees, GXPS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FXG has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GXPS has performed better with a 9.88% return vs 5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GXPS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXG.
FXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.25% for GXPS.
FXG tracks StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index, while GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXG and 0.25% for GXPS.
GXPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXG and GXPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer