FXG vs. GXPS
FXG (First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund) and GXPS (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - FXG tracks the StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index while GXPS tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXG charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GXPS.
Performance
FXG vs. GXPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXG achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than GXPS's 10.56% return.
FXG
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 3.65%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- -0.05%
- 3Y*
- 2.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.76%
GXPS
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 6M
- 9.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXG vs. GXPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund | 3.65% | -4.33% |
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 10.56% | -1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXG and GXPS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXG vs. GXPS — Risk / Return Rank
FXG
GXPS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FXG vs. GXPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXG | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXG vs. GXPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXG drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than GXPS's maximum drawdown of -9.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXG and GXPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXG | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.69% | -9.20% | -29.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.34% | -5.04% | -4.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.04% | -3.96% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.90% | — | — |
Volatility
FXG vs. GXPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXG | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 14.23% | -0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.59% | 14.23% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 14.23% | +0.74% |
FXG vs. GXPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXG has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPS's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXG vs. GXPS - Dividend Comparison
FXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than GXPS's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund | 2.79% | 2.83% | 1.70% | 1.41% | 1.83% | 1.38% | 1.41% | 1.63% | 2.31% | 1.34% | 1.72% | 1.67% |
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 0.54% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXG and GXPS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXG.
FXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.54% for GXPS.
FXG tracks StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index, while GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXG and 0.25% for GXPS.
Find the right allocation for FXG and GXPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer