PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXF vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXF vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXF achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 10.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FXF has underperformed LVHD with an annualized return of 1.06%, while LVHD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.41% annualized return.


FXF

1D
-0.15%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
-0.80%
6M
-0.32%
1Y
1.23%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
1.88%
10Y*
1.06%

LVHD

1D
0.64%
1M
3.86%
YTD
10.95%
6M
10.48%
1Y
13.29%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*
8.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXF vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXF
Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust
-0.80%14.04%-7.46%9.63%-2.29%-4.08%8.18%0.32%-2.01%3.31%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
10.95%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FXF and LVHD is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2015

0.10

The correlation between FXF and LVHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXF vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXF
FXF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXF Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXF Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXF vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXFLVHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.23

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

2.16

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.54

5.43

-4.89

FXF vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXF Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXF and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXF vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXF drawdown since its inception was -35.58%, roughly equal to the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXF and LVHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXFLVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.58%

-37.32%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

-6.17%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.52%

-14.29%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.68%

-16.75%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.04%

-37.32%

+22.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.02%

-1.07%

-17.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.83%

-4.04%

-16.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

2.46%

-0.18%

Volatility

FXF vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) is 1.81%, while Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that FXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXFLVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

3.54%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.56%

6.96%

-1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.49%

9.77%

-2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.33%

12.91%

-4.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.57%

15.52%

-7.95%

FXF vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXF vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

FXF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FXF
Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust
0.00%0.00%0.03%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.27%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXF and LVHD have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVHD has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to FXF (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXF dropped -35.58% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

On 10-year performance, LVHD leads with 8.41% vs 1.06% for FXF. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, FXF has been the lower-risk option at 1.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, LVHD has performed better with a 8.41% return vs 1.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXF.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.00% for FXF.

FXF is categorized as Currency, while LVHD is Dividend. FXF tracks Swiss Franc, while LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FXF and 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXF and LVHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer