FXD vs. IYC
FXD (First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund) and IYC (iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - FXD tracks the StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index while IYC tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXD returned 7.89%/yr vs 11.49%/yr for IYC. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FXD charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IYC.
Performance
FXD vs. IYC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXD achieves a -1.88% return, which is significantly higher than IYC's -2.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FXD has underperformed IYC with an annualized return of 7.89%, while IYC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.49% annualized return.
FXD
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- -1.88%
- 6M
- -1.26%
- 1Y
- 9.00%
- 3Y*
- 10.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- 7.89%
IYC
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- -2.72%
- 6M
- -2.86%
- 1Y
- 3.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.36%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
FXD vs. IYC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXD First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund | -1.88% | 6.70% | 10.57% | 23.39% | -21.56% | 22.72% | 12.97% | 24.22% | -11.60% | 19.77% |
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | -2.72% | 7.85% | 27.54% | 34.03% | -31.78% | 19.65% | 24.58% | 27.36% | 1.76% | 19.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXD and IYC is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007 | 0.86 |
The correlation between FXD and IYC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
FXD vs. IYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXD
IYC
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
FXD
IYC
Consumer Defensive
FXD
IYC
Industrials
FXD
IYC
Communication Services
FXD
IYC
Technology
FXD
IYC
Energy
FXD
IYC
Basic Materials
FXD
-
IYC
-
Financial Services
FXD
-
IYC
-
Healthcare
FXD
-
IYC
-
Real Estate
FXD
-
IYC
-
Utilities
FXD
-
IYC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXD vs. IYC — Risk / Return Rank
FXD
IYC
FXD vs. IYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXD | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 0.24 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 0.44 | +0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.05 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 0.28 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.65 | 0.85 | +0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXD | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 0.24 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.31 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.58 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.42 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
FXD vs. IYC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXD drawdown since its inception was -65.27%, which is greater than IYC's maximum drawdown of -53.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXD and IYC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXD | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.27% | -53.10% | -12.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.94% | -11.97% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.02% | -21.62% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.74% | -35.90% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.54% | -35.90% | -13.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.12% | -6.39% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.97% | -9.95% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.48% | 3.95% | +1.53% |
Volatility
FXD vs. IYC - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) at 3.97%. This indicates that FXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXD | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 3.97% | +2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.23% | 10.50% | +3.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.21% | 14.32% | +4.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 20.73% | +1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.67% | 19.89% | +3.78% |
FXD vs. IYC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than IYC's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXD vs. IYC - Dividend Comparison
FXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than IYC's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXD First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund | 0.78% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 0.70% | 1.00% | 0.62% | 0.42% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 0.93% | 1.05% | 0.90% |
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.47% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.39% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 1.10% | 1.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXD and IYC have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXD has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to IYC (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXD dropped -65.27% vs IYC's -53.10%.
On 10-year performance, IYC leads with 11.49% vs 7.89% for FXD. On fees, IYC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYC has performed better with a 11.49% return vs 7.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXD.
FXD has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.51% for IYC.
FXD tracks StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index, while IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXD and 0.38% for IYC.
FXD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXD and IYC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer