FXD vs. ISHP
FXD (First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund) and ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds from First Trust - FXD tracks the StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index while ISHP tracks the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FXD returned 3.57%/yr vs 2.04%/yr for ISHP. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FXD charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ISHP.
Performance
FXD vs. ISHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXD achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly higher than ISHP's -8.73% return.
FXD
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 10.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.96%
- 5Y*
- 3.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.56%
ISHP
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 4.54%
- 6M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- -8.73%
- 1Y
- -8.31%
- 3Y*
- 8.87%
- 5Y*
- 2.04%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.22M | $850.69K | $681.18K | |
| $7.11K | $5.31K | $3.27K |
FXD vs. ISHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXD First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund | 2.67% | 6.70% | 10.57% | 23.39% | -21.56% | 22.72% | 12.97% | 24.22% | -11.60% | 19.77% |
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | -8.73% | 12.27% | 24.17% | 22.24% | -33.79% | 30.09% | 15.33% | 19.74% | -2.04% | 7.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXD and ISHP is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016 | 0.65 |
The correlation between FXD and ISHP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
FXD vs. ISHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXD
ISHP
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
FXD
ISHP
Industrials
FXD
ISHP
Communication Services
FXD
ISHP
Consumer Defensive
FXD
ISHP
Technology
FXD
ISHP
Energy
FXD
ISHP
-
Basic Materials
FXD
-
ISHP
-
Financial Services
FXD
-
ISHP
Healthcare
FXD
-
ISHP
Real Estate
FXD
-
ISHP
Utilities
FXD
-
ISHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXD vs. ISHP — Risk / Return Rank
FXD
ISHP
FXD vs. ISHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXD | ISHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.93 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | -0.39 | +1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.58 | -0.70 | +2.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXD vs. ISHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXD drawdown since its inception was -65.27%, which is greater than ISHP's maximum drawdown of -47.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXD and ISHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXD | ISHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.27% | -47.57% | -17.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.94% | -24.75% | +10.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.02% | -24.75% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.74% | -47.57% | +13.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.82% | -16.15% | +13.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.91% | -12.76% | +1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.70% | 13.89% | -8.19% |
Volatility
FXD vs. ISHP - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) at 5.32%. This indicates that FXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXD | ISHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 5.32% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.29% | 14.80% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.82% | 18.30% | +1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.81% | 27.32% | -4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.72% | 24.03% | -0.31% |
FXD vs. ISHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than ISHP's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXD vs. ISHP - Dividend Comparison
FXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than ISHP's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXD First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund | 0.60% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 0.70% | 1.00% | 0.62% | 0.42% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 0.93% | 1.05% | 0.90% |
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.14% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXD and ISHP have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXD has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to ISHP (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXD dropped -65.27% vs ISHP's -47.57%.
On 5-year performance, FXD leads with 3.57% vs 2.04% for ISHP. On fees, ISHP is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, ISHP has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FXD has performed better with a 3.57% return vs 2.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISHP is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXD.
ISHP has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.60% for FXD.
FXD tracks StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index, while ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXD and 0.60% for ISHP.
FXD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXD and ISHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer