PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVRR vs. SSRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FVRR vs. SSRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVRR achieves a -44.13% return, which is significantly lower than SSRM's 30.38% return.


FVRR

1D
1.10%
1M
11.97%
6M
-39.14%
YTD
-44.13%
1Y
-59.46%
3Y*
-26.20%
5Y*
-46.02%
10Y*

SSRM

1D
-1.96%
1M
8.59%
6M
29.85%
YTD
30.38%
1Y
125.75%
3Y*
27.10%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
7.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVRR vs. SSRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.
-44.13%-37.72%16.57%-6.59%-74.37%-41.72%730.21%-9.62%
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
30.38%214.94%-35.32%-29.94%-10.02%-10.90%4.41%56.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FVRR and SSRM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FVRR:

$396.90M

SSRM:

$5.93B

EPS

FVRR:

$0.78

SSRM:

$3.26

PE Ratio

FVRR:

14.15

SSRM:

8.76

PEG Ratio

FVRR:

0.07

SSRM:

0.14

PS Ratio

FVRR:

0.95

SSRM:

3.27

PB Ratio

FVRR:

0.96

SSRM:

1.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

FVRR:

$429.22M

SSRM:

$1.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FVRR:

$348.84M

SSRM:

$643.76M

EBITDA (TTM)

FVRR:

$33.15M

SSRM:

$835.27M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVRR vs. SSRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVRR
FVRR Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FVRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVRR Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FVRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVRR Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

SSRM
SSRM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SSRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSRM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SSRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSRM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVRR vs. SSRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVRRSSRMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.31

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

4.18

-5.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

10.21

-11.62

FVRR vs. SSRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVRR Sharpe Ratio is -1.20, which is lower than the SSRM Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVRR and SSRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FVRR vs. SSRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVRR drawdown since its inception was -97.02%, which is greater than SSRM's maximum drawdown of -91.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVRR and SSRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVRRSSRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.02%

-91.68%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.67%

-31.28%

-33.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.86%

-73.41%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.28%

-83.16%

-13.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.58%

-34.34%

-62.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.97%

-57.09%

-10.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.89%

12.80%

+30.09%

Volatility

FVRR vs. SSRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) is 18.08%, while SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) has a volatility of 19.50%. This indicates that FVRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVRRSSRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.08%

19.50%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.53%

55.96%

-14.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.24%

67.57%

-17.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.25%

56.32%

+7.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.88%

53.08%

+17.80%

Dividends

FVRR vs. SSRM - Dividend Comparison

Neither FVRR nor SSRM has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.60%1.79%1.13%

Financials

FVRR vs. SSRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fiverr International Ltd. and SSR Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
105.49M
581.78M
(FVRR) Total Revenue
(SSRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FVRR vs. SSRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fiverr International Ltd. and SSR Mining Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
81.4%
0
Portfolio components
FVRR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a gross profit of 85.83M and revenue of 105.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.

SSRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 581.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FVRR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported an operating income of 8.50M and revenue of 105.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

SSRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 300.38M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.6%.

FVRR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a net income of 8.56M and revenue of 105.49M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.

SSRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a net income of 369.74M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in a net margin of 63.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FVRR and SSRM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSRM has higher volatility (19.50%) compared to FVRR (18.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVRR dropped -97.02% vs SSRM's -91.68%.

SSRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVRR and SSRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer