PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVRR vs. EZPW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FVRR vs. EZPW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) and EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVRR achieves a -44.13% return, which is significantly lower than EZPW's 75.44% return.


FVRR

1D
1.10%
1M
11.97%
6M
-39.14%
YTD
-44.13%
1Y
-59.46%
3Y*
-26.20%
5Y*
-46.02%
10Y*

EZPW

1D
0.00%
1M
10.80%
6M
59.43%
YTD
75.44%
1Y
140.10%
3Y*
58.17%
5Y*
41.25%
10Y*
13.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVRR vs. EZPW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.
-44.13%-37.72%16.57%-6.59%-74.37%-41.72%730.21%-9.62%
EZPW
EZCORP, Inc.
75.44%58.92%39.82%7.24%10.58%53.86%-29.77%-27.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FVRR and EZPW is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.15

The correlation between FVRR and EZPW shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FVRR:

$396.90M

EZPW:

$2.00B

EPS

FVRR:

$0.78

EZPW:

$1.76

PE Ratio

FVRR:

14.15

EZPW:

19.36

PEG Ratio

FVRR:

0.07

EZPW:

0.13

PS Ratio

FVRR:

0.95

EZPW:

1.92

PB Ratio

FVRR:

0.96

EZPW:

2.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

FVRR:

$429.22M

EZPW:

$1.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FVRR:

$348.84M

EZPW:

$865.21M

EBITDA (TTM)

FVRR:

$33.15M

EZPW:

$256.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVRR vs. EZPW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVRR
FVRR Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FVRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVRR Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FVRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVRR Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

EZPW
EZPW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
EZPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZPW Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
EZPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZPW Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVRR vs. EZPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) and EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVRREZPWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.58

-0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

9.11

-10.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

32.14

-33.55

FVRR vs. EZPW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVRR Sharpe Ratio is -1.20, which is lower than the EZPW Sharpe Ratio of 3.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVRR and EZPW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FVRR vs. EZPW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVRR drawdown since its inception was -97.02%, roughly equal to the maximum EZPW drawdown of -97.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVRR and EZPW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVRREZPWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.02%

-97.28%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.67%

-16.19%

-48.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.86%

-20.51%

-52.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.28%

-35.94%

-60.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.58%

-10.51%

-86.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.97%

-59.00%

-8.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.89%

4.58%

+38.31%

Volatility

FVRR vs. EZPW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) is 18.08%, while EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) has a volatility of 19.30%. This indicates that FVRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZPW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVRREZPWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.08%

19.30%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.53%

29.72%

+11.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.24%

37.56%

+12.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.25%

34.42%

+29.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.88%

38.98%

+31.90%

Dividends

FVRR vs. EZPW - Dividend Comparison

Neither FVRR nor EZPW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FVRR vs. EZPW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fiverr International Ltd. and EZCORP, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
105.49M
446.88M
(FVRR) Total Revenue
(EZPW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FVRR vs. EZPW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fiverr International Ltd. and EZCORP, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
81.4%
58.2%
Portfolio components
FVRR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a gross profit of 85.83M and revenue of 105.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.

EZPW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a gross profit of 260.04M and revenue of 446.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.2%.

FVRR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported an operating income of 8.50M and revenue of 105.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

EZPW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported an operating income of 67.84M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.

FVRR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a net income of 8.56M and revenue of 105.49M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.

EZPW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a net income of 49.10M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FVRR and EZPW have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EZPW has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to FVRR (18.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVRR dropped -97.02% vs EZPW's -97.28%.

EZPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVRR and EZPW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer