FVD vs. VTV
FVD (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FVD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Value Line Dividend Index, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FVD returned 8.47%/yr vs 12.50%/yr for VTV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FVD charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
FVD vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 15.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FVD has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 8.47%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.50% annualized return.
FVD
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 6.10%
- YTD
- 7.55%
- 1Y
- 11.06%
- 3Y*
- 9.49%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
VTV
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 12.54%
- YTD
- 15.97%
- 1Y
- 25.53%
- 3Y*
- 18.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.27%
- 10Y*
- 12.50%
FVD vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 7.55% | 8.16% | 10.04% | 4.11% | -5.18% | 25.08% | -0.02% | 26.58% | -3.49% | 12.51% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 15.97% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVD and VTV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FVD and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.89 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FVD vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FVD
VTV
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
FVD
VTV
Utilities
FVD
VTV
Industrials
FVD
VTV
Consumer Defensive
FVD
VTV
Healthcare
FVD
VTV
Real Estate
FVD
VTV
Technology
FVD
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
FVD
VTV
Energy
FVD
VTV
Communication Services
FVD
VTV
Basic Materials
FVD
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVD vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
FVD
VTV
FVD vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FVD | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.43 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 3.91 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.61 | 14.82 | -11.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FVD vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVD | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.00% | -59.27% | +8.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -6.35% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.97% | -14.52% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.41% | -17.04% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.25% | -36.78% | +1.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -0.17% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -7.84% | +2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 1.68% | +1.16% |
Volatility
FVD vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.32%. This indicates that FVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVD | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 3.32% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | 7.77% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.90% | 10.40% | -0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.80% | 13.86% | -1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 16.60% | -1.17% |
FVD vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FVD vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than VTV's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.28% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.34% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.31% | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 2.04% | 2.34% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.87% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FVD and VTV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FVD has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to VTV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVD dropped -51.00% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.50% vs 8.47% for FVD. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 8.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.
FVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.87% for VTV.
FVD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 0.04% for VTV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FVD and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer