FVD vs. DIV
FVD (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund) and DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - FVD tracks the Value Line Dividend Index while DIV tracks the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FVD returned 8.54%/yr vs 3.96%/yr for DIV. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FVD charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DIV.
Performance
FVD vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 3.30% return, which is significantly lower than DIV's 11.37% return. Over the past 10 years, FVD has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 8.54%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 3.96% annualized return.
FVD
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 3.30%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.99%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
DIV
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 11.37%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 13.92%
- 3Y*
- 12.17%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 3.96%
FVD vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 3.30% | 8.16% | 10.04% | 4.11% | -5.18% | 25.08% | -0.02% | 26.58% | -3.49% | 12.51% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 11.37% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVD and DIV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.81 |
The correlation between FVD and DIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
FVD vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FVD
DIV
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
FVD
DIV
Utilities
FVD
DIV
Industrials
FVD
DIV
Consumer Defensive
FVD
DIV
Healthcare
FVD
DIV
Real Estate
FVD
DIV
Technology
FVD
DIV
-
Consumer Cyclical
FVD
DIV
Energy
FVD
DIV
Communication Services
FVD
DIV
Basic Materials
FVD
DIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVD vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
FVD
DIV
FVD vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FVD | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.23 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 2.67 | -1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.52 | 7.27 | -3.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FVD vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, roughly equal to the maximum DIV drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVD | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.00% | -52.74% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -5.23% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.97% | -12.33% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.41% | -21.14% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.25% | -52.74% | +17.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.95% | -3.42% | -1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -7.01% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 1.92% | +0.88% |
Volatility
FVD vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) have volatilities of 3.12% and 3.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVD | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 3.13% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.05% | 7.35% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.73% | 10.52% | -0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 13.67% | -0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.46% | 18.00% | -2.54% |
FVD vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FVD vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than DIV's 6.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.89% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.29% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.34% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.31% | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 2.04% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FVD and DIV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIV has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to FVD (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVD dropped -51.00% vs DIV's -52.74%.
On 10-year performance, FVD leads with 8.54% vs 3.96% for DIV. On fees, DIV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FVD has performed better with a 8.54% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.89%, compared with 2.29% for FVD.
FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index, while DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 0.45% for DIV.
DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FVD and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer