PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FV vs. ROUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FV vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FV achieves a 18.14% return, which is significantly higher than ROUS's 16.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FV having a 13.45% annualized return and ROUS not far behind at 13.01%.


FV

1D
1.48%
1M
11.69%
YTD
18.14%
6M
18.84%
1Y
28.90%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
13.45%

ROUS

1D
0.01%
1M
6.18%
YTD
16.55%
6M
16.75%
1Y
29.42%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
13.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FV vs. ROUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
18.14%7.23%14.73%11.34%-3.93%21.63%28.36%25.73%-8.27%19.97%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
16.55%15.21%17.61%15.05%-9.65%27.33%6.61%23.94%-9.59%22.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FV and ROUS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015

0.75

The correlation between FV and ROUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FV vs. ROUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FV
ROUS

Technology

29.0%
33.2%

Industrials

27.8%
10.4%

Financial Services

19.8%
10.6%

Healthcare

19.4%
10.7%

Energy

17.5%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
9.6%

Communication Services

6.3%
8.6%

Real Estate

0.7%
2.1%

Basic Materials

-

2.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.8%

Utilities

-

3.8%

Technology

FV
29.0%
ROUS
33.2%

Industrials

FV
27.8%
ROUS
10.4%

Financial Services

FV
19.8%
ROUS
10.6%

Healthcare

FV
19.4%
ROUS
10.7%

Energy

FV
17.5%
ROUS
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FV
6.4%
ROUS
9.6%

Communication Services

FV
6.3%
ROUS
8.6%

Real Estate

FV
0.7%
ROUS
2.1%

Basic Materials

FV

-

ROUS
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

FV

-

ROUS
5.8%

Utilities

FV

-

ROUS
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FV vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FV
FV Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FV Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FV vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVROUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.46

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

4.95

-2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.12

20.38

-12.26

FV vs. ROUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FV Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the ROUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FV and ROUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVROUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.60

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.90

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.77

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.67

-0.09

Drawdowns

FV vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FV drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, roughly equal to the maximum ROUS drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FV and ROUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVROUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.04%

-35.51%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.45%

-5.97%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.08%

-15.81%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.08%

-18.91%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.04%

-35.51%

+1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-4.24%

-1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

1.45%

+2.12%

Volatility

FV vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) at 2.54%. This indicates that FV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVROUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

2.54%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.54%

8.50%

+4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.22%

11.37%

+3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.76%

14.38%

+6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.42%

16.96%

+4.46%

FV vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FV has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FV vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison

FV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than ROUS's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
0.52%0.63%0.14%0.47%1.38%0.11%0.06%0.56%0.19%0.67%0.95%0.14%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
1.32%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


FV and ROUS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FV has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to ROUS (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FV dropped -34.04% vs ROUS's -35.51%.

On 10-year performance, FV leads with 13.45% vs 13.01% for ROUS. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FV has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FV.

ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.52% for FV.

FV tracks Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index, while ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for FV and 0.19% for ROUS.

ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FV and ROUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer