PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FV vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FV vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FV achieves a 18.14% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.


FV

1D
1.48%
1M
11.69%
YTD
18.14%
6M
18.84%
1Y
28.90%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
13.45%

KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FV vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
18.14%7.23%14.73%11.34%-3.93%21.63%28.36%25.73%-11.02%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.20%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FV and KNG is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.66

The correlation between FV and KNG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

FV vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FV
KNG

Technology

29.0%
4.3%

Industrials

27.8%
20.3%

Financial Services

19.8%
12.7%

Healthcare

19.4%
10.1%

Energy

17.5%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
5.5%

Communication Services

6.3%

-

Real Estate

0.7%
4.4%

Basic Materials

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

23.5%

Utilities

-

6.1%

Technology

FV
29.0%
KNG
4.3%

Industrials

FV
27.8%
KNG
20.3%

Financial Services

FV
19.8%
KNG
12.7%

Healthcare

FV
19.4%
KNG
10.1%

Energy

FV
17.5%
KNG
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FV
6.4%
KNG
5.5%

Communication Services

FV
6.3%
KNG

-

Real Estate

FV
0.7%
KNG
4.4%

Basic Materials

FV

-

KNG
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

FV

-

KNG
23.5%

Utilities

FV

-

KNG
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FV vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FV
FV Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FV Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FV vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.13

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

0.87

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.12

2.25

+5.87

FV vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FV Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FV and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

0.73

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.32

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.49

+0.09

Drawdowns

FV vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FV drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, roughly equal to the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FV and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.04%

-35.12%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.45%

-8.61%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.08%

-14.24%

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.08%

-18.20%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.89%

+5.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-4.13%

-1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

3.32%

+0.25%

Volatility

FV vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that FV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

2.29%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.54%

7.39%

+5.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.22%

10.19%

+5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.76%

13.59%

+7.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.42%

17.18%

+4.24%

FV vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FV has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FV vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

FV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than KNG's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
0.52%0.63%0.14%0.47%1.38%0.11%0.06%0.56%0.19%0.67%0.95%0.14%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FV and KNG have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FV has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FV dropped -34.04% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 5-year performance, FV leads with 10.37% vs 4.31% for KNG. On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FV has performed better with a 10.37% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FV.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 0.52% for FV.

FV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while KNG is Dividend. FV tracks Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for FV and 0.75% for KNG.

FV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FV and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer