PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUTY vs. IWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUTY vs. IWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUTY achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly lower than IWN's 20.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FUTY has underperformed IWN with an annualized return of 9.07%, while IWN has yielded a comparatively higher 10.58% annualized return.


FUTY

1D
1.14%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
4.88%
6M
5.07%
1Y
11.80%
3Y*
13.69%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
9.07%

IWN

1D
1.17%
1M
4.34%
YTD
20.82%
6M
17.48%
1Y
42.26%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
10.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUTY vs. IWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
4.88%16.40%23.20%-7.46%1.12%17.53%-0.80%24.89%4.36%12.52%
IWN
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
20.82%12.40%7.63%14.56%-14.77%27.96%4.66%22.01%-13.01%7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FUTY and IWN is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.35

FUTY vs. IWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FUTY
IWN

Utilities

99.2%
5.7%

Energy

0.5%
9.2%

Industrials

0.2%
11.1%

Basic Materials

-

5.4%

Communication Services

-

1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.0%

Financial Services

-

24.2%

Healthcare

-

8.8%

Real Estate

-

10.2%

Technology

-

12.4%

Utilities

FUTY
99.2%
IWN
5.7%

Energy

FUTY
0.5%
IWN
9.2%

Industrials

FUTY
0.2%
IWN
11.1%

Basic Materials

FUTY

-

IWN
5.4%

Communication Services

FUTY

-

IWN
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FUTY

-

IWN
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

FUTY

-

IWN
2.0%

Financial Services

FUTY

-

IWN
24.2%

Healthcare

FUTY

-

IWN
8.8%

Real Estate

FUTY

-

IWN
10.2%

Technology

FUTY

-

IWN
12.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUTY vs. IWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUTY
FUTY Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FUTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

IWN
IWN Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWN Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUTY vs. IWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUTYIWNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.40

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

5.02

-3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.88

16.91

-14.03

FUTY vs. IWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the IWN Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUTY and IWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUTY vs. IWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUTY drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, smaller than the maximum IWN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTY and IWN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUTYIWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.44%

-61.55%

+25.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-8.45%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.35%

-26.70%

+9.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.11%

-26.70%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.44%

-46.08%

+9.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.74%

0.00%

-5.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-10.15%

+4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

2.51%

+1.60%

Volatility

FUTY vs. IWN - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) have volatilities of 5.63% and 5.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUTYIWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

5.80%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.54%

12.25%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.43%

18.09%

-3.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.10%

21.47%

-4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.06%

23.41%

-4.35%

FUTY vs. IWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUTY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IWN's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FUTY vs. IWN - Dividend Comparison

FUTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than IWN's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
2.57%2.67%2.96%3.31%2.72%2.70%3.07%2.82%3.11%3.03%3.35%4.33%
IWN
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.42%1.70%1.80%2.04%2.12%1.48%1.60%1.92%1.99%1.78%1.74%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUTY and IWN have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWN has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to FUTY (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUTY dropped -36.44% vs IWN's -61.55%.

On 10-year performance, IWN leads with 10.58% vs 9.07% for FUTY. On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FUTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWN has performed better with a 10.58% return vs 9.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWN.

FUTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 1.42% for IWN.

FUTY is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IWN is Small Cap Value Equities. FUTY tracks MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index, while IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FUTY and 0.24% for IWN.

IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUTY and IWN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer