FUTG vs. HOOG

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) and HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

FUTG vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUTG achieves a -75.13% return, which is significantly lower than HOOG's -50.99% return.

FUTG

• 1D: 3.79%
• 1M: -61.72%
• YTD: -75.13%
• 6M: -77.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HOOG

• 1D: 1.91%
• 1M: 24.95%
• YTD: -50.99%
• 6M: -57.02%
• 1Y: -13.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUTG vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF	-75.13%	-0.20%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	-50.99%	-44.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FUTG and HOOG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025	0.53

Return for Risk

FUTG vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUTG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HOOG

HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 12
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 17
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUTG vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FUTG	HOOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.12	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.83	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.10	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.20	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.31	—

Drawdowns

FUTG vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUTG drawdown since its inception was -86.19%, roughly equal to the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTG and HOOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FUTG	HOOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.19%	-86.94%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-86.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.04%	-77.14%	-6.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.98%	-38.40%	-3.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	54.86%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FUTG	HOOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	45.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	102.28%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	133.43%	138.53%	-5.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	133.43%	144.80%	-11.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	133.43%	144.80%	-11.37%

FUTG vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FUTG and HOOG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

FUTG vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

FUTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.11%.

Position	TTM	2025
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	25.11%	12.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FUTG and HOOG in my portfolio?

FUTG and HOOG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FUTG or HOOG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FUTG or HOOG?

FUTG and HOOG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FUTG or HOOG?

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 25.11%, compared with 0.00% for FUTG.