PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUTG vs. NUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUTG vs. NUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF (NUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUTG achieves a -74.13% return, which is significantly lower than NUG's -49.34% return.


FUTG

1D
6.77%
1M
20.19%
YTD
-74.13%
6M
-74.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NUG

1D
1.13%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
-49.34%
6M
-48.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUTG vs. NUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FUTG and NUG is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUTG vs. NUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF (NUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FUTG vs. NUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUTG vs. NUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUTG drawdown since its inception was -86.19%, which is greater than NUG's maximum drawdown of -66.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTG and NUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUTGNUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.19%

-66.15%

-20.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.40%

-59.01%

-24.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.21%

-31.80%

-11.41%

Volatility

FUTG vs. NUG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUTGNUGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

132.29%

79.90%

+52.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

132.29%

79.90%

+52.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

132.29%

79.90%

+52.39%

FUTG vs. NUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FUTG and NUG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

FUTG vs. NUG - Dividend Comparison

Neither FUTG nor NUG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FUTG and NUG have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FUTG and NUG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

FUTG and NUG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUTG and NUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer