FUNL vs. GCOW
Compare and contrast key facts about CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW).
FUNL and GCOW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FUNL is an actively managed fund by CornerCap. It was launched on Aug 19, 2020. GCOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2016.
Performance
FUNL vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FUNL vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL | 5.66% | 14.62% | 15.55% | 14.33% | -5.76% | 25.93% | 14.92% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 13.21% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 14.58% | 13.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUNL achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 13.21% return.
FUNL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.66%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 21.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- —
GCOW
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 13.21%
- 6M
- 20.65%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FUNL vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUNL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FUNL vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
FUNL
GCOW
FUNL vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FUNL | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 2.27 | -0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 3.01 | -1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.44 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 2.77 | -1.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.41 | 14.12 | -5.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FUNL | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 2.27 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 1.02 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.60 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between FUNL and GCOW is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FUNL vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
FUNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than GCOW's 4.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL | 2.25% | 2.10% | 1.78% | 1.69% | 1.84% | 1.55% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.39% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
FUNL vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUNL drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUNL and GCOW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUNL | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.35% | -37.64% | +18.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.76% | -11.05% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.35% | -21.48% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -1.84% | +1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -5.90% | +2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 2.17% | +0.20% |
Volatility
FUNL vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) is 0.12%, while Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that FUNL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FUNL | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.12% | 4.03% | -3.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.10% | 7.90% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 13.89% | +2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 13.48% | +1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 16.25% | -0.72% |