FUNL vs. MFVL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL).

FUNL and MFVL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FUNL is an actively managed fund by CornerCap. It was launched on Aug 19, 2020. MFVL is an actively managed fund by Motley Fool. It was launched on Dec 8, 2025.

Performance

FUNL vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FUNL vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	5.66%	1.84%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	-1.60%	1.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUNL achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's -1.60% return.

FUNL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 9.20%
• 1Y: 21.44%
• 3Y*: 16.56%
• 5Y*: 10.82%
• 10Y*: —

MFVL

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -5.21%
• YTD: -1.60%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUNL vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FUNL and MFVL have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

FUNL

CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL

MFVL

Motley Fool Value Factor ETF

Return for Risk

FUNL vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUNL

FUNL Risk / Return Rank: 73
FUNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FUNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FUNL Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FUNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FUNL Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUNL vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FUNL	MFVL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.41	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FUNL	MFVL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	-0.07	+1.04

Correlation

The correlation between FUNL and MFVL is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FUNL vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison

FUNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	2.25%	2.10%	1.78%	1.69%	1.84%	1.55%	0.45%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FUNL vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUNL drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -6.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUNL and MFVL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FUNL	MFVL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.35%	-6.49%	-12.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-5.21%	+5.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.64%	-1.41%	-2.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FUNL	MFVL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.10%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.12%	11.67%	+4.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.29%	11.67%	+3.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.53%	11.67%	+3.86%