FUN vs. UHS
FUN (Cedar Fair, L.P.) and UHS (Universal Health Services, Inc.) are both stocks. FUN operates in Leisure (Consumer Cyclical), while UHS operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, FUN returned -5.82%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for UHS. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FUN vs. UHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUN achieves a 52.80% return, which is significantly higher than UHS's -32.68% return. Over the past 10 years, FUN has underperformed UHS with an annualized return of -5.82%, while UHS has yielded a comparatively higher 1.37% annualized return.
FUN
- 1D
- -3.90%
- 1M
- 9.94%
- YTD
- 52.80%
- 6M
- 57.21%
- 1Y
- -21.53%
- 3Y*
- -16.99%
- 5Y*
- -11.16%
- 10Y*
- -5.82%
UHS
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -13.06%
- YTD
- -32.68%
- 6M
- -34.07%
- 1Y
- -14.04%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
FUN vs. UHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUN Cedar Fair, L.P. | 52.80% | -68.17% | 26.39% | -0.96% | -16.23% | 27.25% | -27.49% | 25.65% | -22.66% | 6.45% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | -32.68% | 22.02% | 18.19% | 8.83% | 9.37% | -5.16% | -4.00% | 23.62% | 3.16% | 6.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUN and UHS is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.17 |
The correlation between FUN and UHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FUN:
-$16.06
UHS:
$31.29
FUN:
0.82
UHS:
0.40
FUN:
$2.90B
UHS:
$17.76B
FUN:
$1.59B
UHS:
$12.01B
FUN:
-$733.45M
UHS:
$2.79B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUN vs. UHS — Risk / Return Rank
FUN
UHS
FUN vs. UHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) and Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUN | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.93 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | -0.37 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.66 | -0.89 | +0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUN vs. UHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUN drawdown since its inception was -77.75%, which is greater than UHS's maximum drawdown of -60.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUN and UHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUN | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.75% | -60.27% | -17.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.05% | -41.52% | -19.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.74% | -41.52% | -36.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.74% | -44.90% | -32.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.75% | -56.30% | -21.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.33% | -39.85% | -19.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.87% | -14.82% | -5.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.79% | 17.33% | +22.46% |
Volatility
FUN vs. UHS - Volatility Comparison
Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) has a higher volatility of 15.26% compared to Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) at 7.25%. This indicates that FUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUN | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.26% | 7.25% | +8.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.94% | 25.18% | +19.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.85% | 31.46% | +35.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.02% | 31.82% | +12.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.15% | 34.37% | +10.78% |
Dividends
FUN vs. UHS - Dividend Comparison
FUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUN Cedar Fair, L.P. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.42% | 3.02% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 6.69% | 7.60% | 5.32% | 5.19% | 5.51% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | 0.55% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.33% |
Financials
FUN vs. UHS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cedar Fair, L.P. and Universal Health Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FUN and UHS have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUN has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to UHS (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUN dropped -77.75% vs UHS's -60.27%.
FUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FUN and UHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer