FUN vs. CSL
FUN (Cedar Fair, L.P.) and CSL (Carlisle Companies Incorporated) are both stocks. FUN operates in Leisure (Consumer Cyclical), while CSL operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, FUN returned -5.82%/yr vs 14.57%/yr for CSL. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FUN vs. CSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUN achieves a 52.80% return, which is significantly higher than CSL's 8.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FUN has underperformed CSL with an annualized return of -5.82%, while CSL has yielded a comparatively higher 14.57% annualized return.
FUN
- 1D
- -3.90%
- 1M
- 9.94%
- YTD
- 52.80%
- 6M
- 57.21%
- 1Y
- -21.53%
- 3Y*
- -16.99%
- 5Y*
- -11.16%
- 10Y*
- -5.82%
CSL
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- YTD
- 8.12%
- 6M
- 4.47%
- 1Y
- -2.49%
- 3Y*
- 14.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.87%
- 10Y*
- 14.57%
FUN vs. CSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUN Cedar Fair, L.P. | 52.80% | -68.17% | 26.39% | -0.96% | -16.23% | 27.25% | -27.49% | 25.65% | -22.66% | 6.45% |
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 8.12% | -12.26% | 19.14% | 34.26% | -4.08% | 60.64% | -1.96% | 63.10% | -10.31% | 4.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUN and CSL is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.23 |
The correlation between FUN and CSL shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FUN:
$2.38B
CSL:
$14.13B
FUN:
-$16.06
CSL:
$17.08
FUN:
0.82
CSL:
2.93
FUN:
0.26
CSL:
8.55
FUN:
$2.90B
CSL:
$4.98B
FUN:
$1.59B
CSL:
$1.41B
FUN:
-$733.45M
CSL:
$1.17B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUN vs. CSL — Risk / Return Rank
FUN
CSL
FUN vs. CSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUN | CSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.01 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | -0.16 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.66 | -0.27 | -0.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUN vs. CSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUN drawdown since its inception was -77.75%, which is greater than CSL's maximum drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUN and CSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUN | CSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.75% | -64.56% | -13.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.05% | -31.67% | -29.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.74% | -37.72% | -40.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.74% | -37.72% | -40.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.75% | -38.68% | -39.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.33% | -27.08% | -32.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.87% | -12.32% | -7.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.79% | 18.90% | +20.89% |
Volatility
FUN vs. CSL - Volatility Comparison
Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) has a higher volatility of 15.26% compared to Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) at 10.87%. This indicates that FUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUN | CSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.26% | 10.87% | +4.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.94% | 24.85% | +20.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.85% | 36.22% | +30.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.02% | 30.81% | +13.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.15% | 29.68% | +15.47% |
Dividends
FUN vs. CSL - Dividend Comparison
FUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 1.28% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 1.02% | 1.09% | 0.86% | 1.31% | 1.11% | 1.53% | 1.27% | 1.18% | 1.24% |
FUN Cedar Fair, L.P. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.42% | 3.02% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 6.69% | 7.60% | 5.32% | 5.19% | 5.51% |
Financials
FUN vs. CSL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cedar Fair, L.P. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FUN and CSL have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUN has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to CSL (10.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUN dropped -77.75% vs CSL's -64.56%.
CSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FUN and CSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer