FUMB vs. CIBR
FUMB (First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FUMB is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. FUMB is actively managed, while CIBR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FUMB returned 1.99%/yr vs 14.23%/yr for CIBR. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FUMB charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.
Performance
FUMB vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUMB achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 31.78% return.
FUMB
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 2.19%
- 3Y*
- 2.92%
- 5Y*
- 1.99%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.78%
CIBR
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 35.30%
- YTD
- 31.78%
- 1Y
- 31.99%
- 3Y*
- 28.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.23%
- 10Y*
- 18.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $124.81M | $136.12M | $141.72M | |
| $985.06K | $934.27K | $1.49M |
FUMB vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUMB First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF | 1.39% | 2.78% | 3.05% | 2.84% | -0.03% | 0.38% | 1.25% | 1.76% | 0.35% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 31.78% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | -7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUMB and CIBR is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2018 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUMB vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
FUMB
CIBR
FUMB vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUMB | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.22 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.61 | 1.46 | +8.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.75 | 3.38 | +29.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUMB vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUMB drawdown since its inception was -2.68%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUMB and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUMB | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -33.89% | +31.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.23% | -21.99% | +21.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.60% | -21.99% | +21.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.25% | -33.89% | +32.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.87% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.19% | -8.62% | +8.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | 9.49% | -9.42% |
Volatility
FUMB vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB) is 0.35%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that FUMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUMB | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.35% | 7.60% | -7.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.62% | 22.41% | -21.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84% | 26.03% | -25.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.18% | 25.31% | -24.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.75% | 23.65% | -21.90% |
FUMB vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUMB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FUMB vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
FUMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than CIBR's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.42% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
FUMB First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF | 2.75% | 2.90% | 2.86% | 2.24% | 1.02% | 0.43% | 0.94% | 1.74% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FUMB and CIBR have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to FUMB (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUMB dropped -2.68% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
On 5-year performance, CIBR leads with 14.23% vs 1.99% for FUMB. On fees, FUMB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FUMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 14.23% return vs 1.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FUMB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.
FUMB has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 0.42% for CIBR.
FUMB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FUMB and 0.60% for CIBR.
FUMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FUMB and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer