FULC vs. TRTN-PA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FULC (Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc.) and TRTN-PA (Triton International Ltd) are both stocks. FULC operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while TRTN-PA operates in Rental & Leasing Services (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, FULC returned -15.20%/yr vs 6.49%/yr for TRTN-PA. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FULC vs. TRTN-PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc. (FULC) and Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FULC achieves a -65.96% return, which is significantly lower than TRTN-PA's 3.89% return.

FULC

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: -41.40%
• YTD: -65.96%
• 6M: -67.35%
• 1Y: -46.30%
• 3Y*: 7.03%
• 5Y*: -15.20%
• 10Y*: —

TRTN-PA

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.07%
• YTD: 3.89%
• 6M: 5.11%
• 1Y: 10.12%
• 3Y*: 8.88%
• 5Y*: 6.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FULC vs. TRTN-PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FULC Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc.	-65.96%	140.64%	-30.37%	-7.28%	-58.85%	51.07%	-29.63%	14.76%
TRTN-PA Triton International Ltd	3.89%	9.17%	10.10%	8.47%	-0.37%	8.71%	7.39%	7.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FULC and TRTN-PA is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019	0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap FULC : $293.43M TRTN-PA : $2.58B
EPS FULC : -$1.15 TRTN-PA : $4.65
PB Ratio FULC : 0.88 TRTN-PA : 1.62
Total Revenue (TTM) FULC : $0.00 TRTN-PA : $1.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) FULC : $0.00 TRTN-PA : $872.64M
EBITDA (TTM) FULC : -$78.37M TRTN-PA : $1.11B

Return for Risk

FULC vs. TRTN-PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FULC

FULC Risk / Return Rank: 22
FULC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
FULC Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FULC Omega Ratio Rank: 29
FULC Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FULC Martin Ratio Rank: 10

TRTN-PA

TRTN-PA Risk / Return Rank: 82
TRTN-PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
TRTN-PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
TRTN-PA Omega Ratio Rank: 76
TRTN-PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
TRTN-PA Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FULC vs. TRTN-PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc. (FULC) and Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FULC	TRTN-PA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.47	1.37	-1.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.11	1.91	-2.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.26	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.59	3.46	-4.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	13.06	-14.40

FULC vs. TRTN-PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FULC Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the TRTN-PA Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FULC and TRTN-PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FULC vs. TRTN-PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FULC drawdown since its inception was -92.70%, which is greater than TRTN-PA's maximum drawdown of -57.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FULC and TRTN-PA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FULC	TRTN-PA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.70%	-57.11%	-35.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.49%	-2.93%	-75.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-79.08%	-2.94%	-76.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.70%	-7.48%	-85.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.57%	-0.42%	-87.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-62.83%	-2.31%	-60.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.55%	0.78%	+33.77%

Volatility

FULC vs. TRTN-PA - Volatility Comparison

Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc. (FULC) has a higher volatility of 74.34% compared to Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA) at 1.81%. This indicates that FULC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRTN-PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FULC	TRTN-PA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	74.34%	1.81%	+72.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	87.06%	5.21%	+81.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	99.81%	7.40%	+92.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	111.35%	8.80%	+102.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	111.66%	21.28%	+90.38%

Dividends

FULC vs. TRTN-PA - Dividend Comparison

FULC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRTN-PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FULC Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRTN-PA Triton International Ltd	8.32%	8.30%	8.33%	8.45%	8.43%	7.75%	7.81%	5.80%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FULC and TRTN-PA in my portfolio?

FULC and TRTN-PA have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FULC or TRTN-PA?

FULC has higher volatility (74.34%) compared to TRTN-PA (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FULC dropped -92.70% vs TRTN-PA's -57.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRTN-PA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.