TRTN-PA vs. SIVR

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

TRTN-PA (Triton International Ltd) is a stock, while SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Over the past 5 years, TRTN-PA returned 6.44%/yr vs 17.63%/yr for SIVR. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TRTN-PA vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRTN-PA achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's -16.16% return.

TRTN-PA

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 1.65%
• 6M: 5.81%
• YTD: 5.53%
• 1Y: 9.28%
• 3Y*: 9.64%
• 5Y*: 6.44%
• 10Y*: —

SIVR

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -11.98%
• 6M: -25.37%
• YTD: -16.16%
• 1Y: 54.52%
• 3Y*: 36.76%
• 5Y*: 17.63%
• 10Y*: 11.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRTN-PA vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TRTN-PA Triton International Ltd	5.53%	9.17%	10.10%	8.47%	-0.37%	8.71%	7.39%	17.61%
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	-16.16%	145.34%	21.08%	-0.91%	2.59%	-12.33%	47.52%	15.47%

Correlation

The correlation between TRTN-PA and SIVR is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019	0.07

Return for Risk

TRTN-PA vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRTN-PA

TRTN-PA Risk / Return Rank: 85
TRTN-PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
TRTN-PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
TRTN-PA Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TRTN-PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
TRTN-PA Martin Ratio Rank: 94

SIVR

SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 32
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRTN-PA vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRTN-PA	SIVR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.00	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	1.42	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.23	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	1.19	+2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.19	2.49	+10.71

TRTN-PA vs. SIVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRTN-PA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the SIVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRTN-PA and SIVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TRTN-PA vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRTN-PA drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTN-PA and SIVR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRTN-PA	SIVR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.11%	-75.85%	+18.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.93%	-50.92%	+47.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.94%	-50.92%	+47.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.48%	-50.92%	+43.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.71%	-48.85%	+48.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.29%	-47.83%	+45.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	24.36%	-23.58%

Volatility

TRTN-PA vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA) is 1.93%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that TRTN-PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRTN-PA	SIVR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.93%	14.32%	-12.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.18%	57.41%	-52.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.52%	60.96%	-53.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.80%	36.83%	-28.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.22%	32.18%	-10.96%

Dividends

TRTN-PA vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison

TRTN-PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, while SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRTN-PA Triton International Ltd	8.19%	8.30%	8.33%	8.45%	8.43%	7.75%	7.81%	5.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRTN-PA and SIVR in my portfolio?

TRTN-PA and SIVR have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRTN-PA or SIVR?

SIVR has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to TRTN-PA (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRTN-PA dropped -57.11% vs SIVR's -75.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRTN-PA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.