TRTN-PA vs. SIVR
TRTN-PA (Triton International Ltd) is a stock, while SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Over the past 5 years, TRTN-PA returned 6.30%/yr vs 19.98%/yr for SIVR. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRTN-PA vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRTN-PA achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's -8.44% return.
TRTN-PA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 3.86%
- 6M
- 3.93%
- 1Y
- 10.11%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- —
SIVR
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -13.77%
- YTD
- -8.44%
- 6M
- -5.58%
- 1Y
- 80.34%
- 3Y*
- 42.28%
- 5Y*
- 19.98%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
TRTN-PA vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRTN-PA Triton International Ltd | 3.86% | 9.17% | 10.10% | 8.47% | -0.37% | 8.71% | 7.39% | 17.61% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -8.44% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRTN-PA and SIVR is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRTN-PA vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank
TRTN-PA
SIVR
TRTN-PA vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRTN-PA | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.28 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 1.78 | +1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.06 | 3.72 | +9.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRTN-PA vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRTN-PA drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTN-PA and SIVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRTN-PA | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.11% | -75.85% | +18.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -45.33% | +42.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.94% | -45.33% | +42.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.48% | -45.33% | +37.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -44.14% | +43.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | -47.83% | +45.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 21.67% | -20.89% |
Volatility
TRTN-PA vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA) is 1.84%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 13.63%. This indicates that TRTN-PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRTN-PA | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.84% | 13.63% | -11.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.21% | 59.02% | -53.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.42% | 60.12% | -52.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.81% | 36.53% | -27.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 32.08% | -10.79% |
Dividends
TRTN-PA vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
TRTN-PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%, while SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRTN-PA Triton International Ltd | 8.32% | 8.30% | 8.33% | 8.45% | 8.43% | 7.75% | 7.81% | 5.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRTN-PA and SIVR have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (13.63%) compared to TRTN-PA (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRTN-PA dropped -57.11% vs SIVR's -75.85%.
TRTN-PA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRTN-PA and SIVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer