FULC vs. CHD
FULC (Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc.) and CHD (Church & Dwight Co., Inc.) are both stocks. FULC operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while CHD operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, FULC returned -13.31%/yr vs 3.91%/yr for CHD. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FULC vs. CHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FULC achieves a -68.35% return, which is significantly lower than CHD's 18.59% return.
FULC
- 1D
- -3.76%
- 1M
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -66.64%
- YTD
- -68.35%
- 1Y
- -47.58%
- 3Y*
- -1.18%
- 5Y*
- -13.31%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -18.03%
CHD
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 18.59%
- 1Y
- 6.48%
- 3Y*
- 2.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $191.62M | $175.25M | $190.70M | |
| $4.67M | $5.87M | $9.42M |
FULC vs. CHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FULC Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc. | -68.35% | 140.64% | -30.37% | -7.28% | -58.85% | 51.07% | -29.63% | 14.76% |
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 18.59% | -18.91% | 11.96% | 18.72% | -20.41% | 18.89% | 25.46% | -6.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between FULC and CHD is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019 | 0.04 |
Fundamentals
FULC:
$193.72M
CHD:
$23.41B
FULC:
-$1.22
CHD:
$3.10
FULC:
0.88
CHD:
5.41
FULC:
$0.00
CHD:
$6.23B
FULC:
-$14.33M
CHD:
$2.84B
FULC:
-$87.10M
CHD:
$1.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FULC vs. CHD — Risk / Return Rank
FULC
CHD
FULC vs. CHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc. (FULC) and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FULC | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.07 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 0.46 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | 0.82 | -1.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FULC vs. CHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FULC drawdown since its inception was -92.70%, which is greater than CHD's maximum drawdown of -51.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FULC and CHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FULC | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.70% | -51.52% | -41.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.49% | -14.61% | -63.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.08% | -27.28% | -51.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.70% | -31.72% | -60.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.44% | -11.29% | -77.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.22% | -12.01% | -51.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.97% | 8.29% | +33.68% |
Volatility
FULC vs. CHD - Volatility Comparison
Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc. (FULC) has a higher volatility of 11.42% compared to Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) at 6.92%. This indicates that FULC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FULC | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.42% | 6.92% | +4.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 85.76% | 16.78% | +68.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 98.20% | 22.97% | +75.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 111.00% | 20.89% | +90.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.92% | 21.93% | +88.99% |
Dividends
FULC vs. CHD - Dividend Comparison
FULC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 1.22% | 1.41% | 1.08% | 1.15% | 1.30% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.61% | 1.58% |
FULC Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FULC vs. CHD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc. and Church & Dwight Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FULC and CHD have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FULC has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to CHD (6.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FULC dropped -92.70% vs CHD's -51.52%.
CHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FULC and CHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer