PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRTN-PA vs. CODX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRTN-PA vs. CODX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA) and Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (CODX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRTN-PA achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly higher than CODX's -48.40% return.


TRTN-PA

1D
0.00%
1M
1.65%
6M
5.60%
YTD
5.53%
1Y
9.28%
3Y*
9.71%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*

CODX

1D
0.00%
1M
-39.16%
6M
-56.35%
YTD
-48.40%
1Y
-65.20%
3Y*
-59.91%
5Y*
-58.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRTN-PA vs. CODX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRTN-PA
Triton International Ltd
5.53%9.17%10.10%8.47%-0.37%8.71%7.39%17.61%
CODX
Co-Diagnostics, Inc.
-48.40%-77.52%-43.61%-47.22%-71.78%-3.98%939.11%-24.79%

Correlation

The correlation between TRTN-PA and CODX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

-0.01

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TRTN-PA:

$2.62B

CODX:

$2.91M

EPS

TRTN-PA:

$4.65

CODX:

-$36.17

PS Ratio

TRTN-PA:

1.95

CODX:

5.44

PB Ratio

TRTN-PA:

1.65

CODX:

0.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRTN-PA:

$1.35B

CODX:

$622.49K

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRTN-PA:

$872.64M

CODX:

$400.11K

EBITDA (TTM)

TRTN-PA:

$1.11B

CODX:

-$47.41M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRTN-PA vs. CODX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRTN-PA
TRTN-PA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TRTN-PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRTN-PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRTN-PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TRTN-PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRTN-PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CODX
CODX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CODX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CODX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
CODX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CODX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CODX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRTN-PA vs. CODX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA) and Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (CODX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRTN-PACODXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.30

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

-0.68

+3.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.91

-0.87

+12.78

TRTN-PA vs. CODX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRTN-PA Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the CODX Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRTN-PA and CODX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRTN-PA vs. CODX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRTN-PA drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, smaller than the maximum CODX drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTN-PA and CODX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRTN-PACODXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.11%

-99.86%

+42.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-96.60%

+93.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.94%

-97.68%

+94.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.48%

-99.62%

+92.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-99.72%

+99.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-76.82%

+74.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

74.70%

-73.92%

Volatility

TRTN-PA vs. CODX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA) is 1.93%, while Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (CODX) has a volatility of 29.36%. This indicates that TRTN-PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CODX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRTN-PACODXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

29.36%

-27.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.18%

188.06%

-182.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.48%

352.08%

-344.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.80%

172.99%

-164.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.22%

171.17%

-149.95%

Dividends

TRTN-PA vs. CODX - Dividend Comparison

TRTN-PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, while CODX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CODX
Co-Diagnostics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRTN-PA
Triton International Ltd
8.19%8.30%8.33%8.45%8.43%7.75%7.81%5.80%

Financials

TRTN-PA vs. CODX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Triton International Ltd and Co-Diagnostics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
331.25M
263.92K
(TRTN-PA) Total Revenue
(CODX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TRTN-PA and CODX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CODX has higher volatility (29.36%) compared to TRTN-PA (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRTN-PA dropped -57.11% vs CODX's -99.86%.

TRTN-PA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRTN-PA and CODX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer