TRTN-PA vs. RNMBY
TRTN-PA (Triton International Ltd) and RNMBY (Rheinmetall AG ADR) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — TRTN-PA in Rental & Leasing Services, RNMBY in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 5 years, TRTN-PA returned 6.75%/yr vs 71.11%/yr for RNMBY. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TRTN-PA vs. RNMBY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRTN-PA achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly higher than RNMBY's -27.26% return.
TRTN-PA
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 8.40%
- 3Y*
- 10.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.01%
RNMBY
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- 6M
- -36.90%
- YTD
- -27.26%
- 1Y
- -32.52%
- 3Y*
- 67.41%
- 5Y*
- 71.11%
- 10Y*
- 36.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 30.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR | $13.82M | $17.27M | $25.26M |
TRTN-PA Triton International Ltd | $52.29K | $69.12K | $83.28K |
TRTN-PA vs. RNMBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRTN-PA Triton International Ltd | 5.98% | 9.17% | 10.10% | 8.47% | -0.37% | 8.71% | 7.39% | 17.61% |
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR | -27.26% | 190.28% | 99.83% | 63.35% | 122.00% | -13.84% | -2.03% | 2.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRTN-PA and RNMBY is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
TRTN-PA:
$2.64B
RNMBY:
$61.24B
TRTN-PA:
$4.65
RNMBY:
€3.74
TRTN-PA:
5.61
RNMBY:
61.00
TRTN-PA:
1.95
RNMBY:
4.59
TRTN-PA:
1.65
RNMBY:
9.98
TRTN-PA:
$1.35B
RNMBY:
€9.58B
TRTN-PA:
$872.64M
RNMBY:
€4.12B
TRTN-PA:
$1.11B
RNMBY:
€1.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRTN-PA vs. RNMBY — Risk / Return Rank
TRTN-PA
RNMBY
TRTN-PA vs. RNMBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRTN-PA | RNMBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.91 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | -0.61 | +4.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.79 | -1.23 | +13.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRTN-PA vs. RNMBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRTN-PA drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, smaller than the maximum RNMBY drawdown of -67.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTN-PA and RNMBY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRTN-PA | RNMBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.11% | -67.75% | +10.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.23% | -53.78% | +51.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.94% | -53.78% | +50.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.28% | -53.78% | +46.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -43.19% | +42.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -17.03% | +14.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 26.54% | -25.79% |
Volatility
TRTN-PA vs. RNMBY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA) is 2.23%, while Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) has a volatility of 12.96%. This indicates that TRTN-PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNMBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRTN-PA | RNMBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.23% | 12.96% | -10.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.32% | 40.28% | -34.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.99% | 49.84% | -42.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.76% | 45.92% | -37.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.15% | 41.89% | -20.74% |
Dividends
TRTN-PA vs. RNMBY - Dividend Comparison
TRTN-PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.16%, more than RNMBY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR | 1.03% | 0.49% | 0.96% | 1.46% | 1.82% | 1.72% | 1.56% | 1.36% | 1.47% | 2.06% | 2.97% | 0.53% |
TRTN-PA Triton International Ltd | 8.16% | 8.30% | 8.33% | 8.45% | 8.43% | 7.75% | 7.81% | 5.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TRTN-PA vs. RNMBY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Triton International Ltd and Rheinmetall AG ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRTN-PA vs. RNMBY - Profitability Comparison
TRTN-PA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Triton International Ltd reported a gross profit of 206.99M and revenue of 331.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.
RNMBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a gross profit of 430.97M and revenue of 1.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.
TRTN-PA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Triton International Ltd reported an operating income of 180.12M and revenue of 331.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.4%.
RNMBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported an operating income of 178.89M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
TRTN-PA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Triton International Ltd reported a net income of 106.44M and revenue of 331.25M, resulting in a net margin of 32.1%.
RNMBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a net income of 112.83M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRTN-PA and RNMBY have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNMBY has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to TRTN-PA (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRTN-PA dropped -57.11% vs RNMBY's -67.75%.
TRTN-PA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRTN-PA and RNMBY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer