FTXR vs. IFRA
FTXR (First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF) and IFRA (iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - FTXR tracks the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Transportation Index while IFRA tracks the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTXR returned 6.66%/yr vs 13.03%/yr for IFRA. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTXR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IFRA.
Performance
FTXR vs. IFRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXR achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly lower than IFRA's 16.86% return.
FTXR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 11.32%
- YTD
- 14.58%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 43.09%
- 3Y*
- 19.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- —
IFRA
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 28.44%
- 3Y*
- 20.10%
- 5Y*
- 13.03%
- 10Y*
- —
FTXR vs. IFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXR First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF | 14.58% | 14.70% | 17.09% | 20.93% | -25.38% | 24.02% | 15.03% | 14.82% | -13.13% |
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 16.86% | 15.90% | 17.02% | 13.42% | -3.32% | 29.81% | 7.37% | 27.00% | -8.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXR and IFRA is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018 | 0.72 |
The correlation between FTXR and IFRA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTXR vs. IFRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTXR
IFRA
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
FTXR
IFRA
Consumer Cyclical
FTXR
IFRA
Energy
FTXR
IFRA
Basic Materials
FTXR
-
IFRA
Communication Services
FTXR
-
IFRA
-
Consumer Defensive
FTXR
-
IFRA
Financial Services
FTXR
-
IFRA
-
Healthcare
FTXR
-
IFRA
-
Real Estate
FTXR
-
IFRA
-
Technology
FTXR
-
IFRA
-
Utilities
FTXR
-
IFRA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXR vs. IFRA — Risk / Return Rank
FTXR
IFRA
FTXR vs. IFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTXR | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.99 | 1.94 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.80 | 2.85 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 3.40 | -0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.08 | 12.70 | -2.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTXR | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 1.94 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.73 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.63 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
FTXR vs. IFRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXR drawdown since its inception was -52.06%, which is greater than IFRA's maximum drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXR and IFRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXR | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.06% | -41.06% | -11.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.49% | -8.40% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.71% | -19.93% | -9.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.96% | -19.93% | -14.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -2.66% | +1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.06% | -5.14% | -5.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 2.25% | +2.04% |
Volatility
FTXR vs. IFRA - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) at 4.89%. This indicates that FTXR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXR | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.70% | 4.89% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.48% | 11.32% | +5.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.79% | 14.79% | +7.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.85% | 17.92% | +5.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.75% | 21.38% | +3.37% |
FTXR vs. IFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IFRA's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXR vs. IFRA - Dividend Comparison
FTXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than IFRA's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXR First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF | 1.14% | 1.52% | 2.13% | 1.50% | 2.38% | 0.67% | 0.33% | 1.34% | 1.74% | 1.18% | 0.24% |
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 1.59% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 2.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXR and IFRA have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXR has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to IFRA (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXR dropped -52.06% vs IFRA's -41.06%.
On 5-year performance, IFRA leads with 13.03% vs 6.66% for FTXR. On fees, IFRA is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, IFRA has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IFRA has performed better with a 13.03% return vs 6.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFRA is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXR.
IFRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 1.14% for FTXR.
FTXR tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Transportation Index, while IFRA tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXR and 0.30% for IFRA.
FTXR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTXR and IFRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer