PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTXL vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTXL vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXL achieves a 115.70% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's 28.52% return.


FTXL

1D
2.21%
1M
30.59%
YTD
115.70%
6M
113.17%
1Y
225.15%
3Y*
61.52%
5Y*
34.63%
10Y*

CIBR

1D
-2.81%
1M
31.43%
YTD
28.52%
6M
24.03%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
28.32%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*
18.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXL vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
115.70%48.94%7.59%54.41%-33.88%36.04%46.08%61.77%-14.47%32.19%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
28.52%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%50.53%28.52%1.47%18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXL and CIBR is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between FTXL and CIBR has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FTXL vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTXL
CIBR

Technology

99.5%
94.0%

Industrials

0.5%
3.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FTXL
99.5%
CIBR
94.0%

Industrials

FTXL
0.5%
CIBR
3.5%

Basic Materials

FTXL

-

CIBR

-

Communication Services

FTXL

-

CIBR
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FTXL

-

CIBR

-

Consumer Defensive

FTXL

-

CIBR

-

Energy

FTXL

-

CIBR

-

Financial Services

FTXL

-

CIBR

-

Healthcare

FTXL

-

CIBR

-

Real Estate

FTXL

-

CIBR

-

Utilities

FTXL

-

CIBR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTXL vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXL
FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXL vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTXLCIBRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.33

1.06

+5.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.74

1.56

+4.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

1.20

+0.58

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

15.62

1.18

+14.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

58.28

2.79

+55.49

FTXL vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXL Sharpe Ratio is 6.33, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXL and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTXLCIBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.33

1.06

+5.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.66

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.67

+0.27

Drawdowns

FTXL vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXL drawdown since its inception was -43.87%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXL and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTXLCIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.87%

-33.89%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.51%

-21.99%

+7.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.57%

-21.99%

-19.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.87%

-33.89%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.81%

+2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.56%

-8.66%

-1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

9.25%

-5.37%

Volatility

FTXL vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a higher volatility of 14.28% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) at 10.90%. This indicates that FTXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTXLCIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.28%

10.90%

+3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.98%

20.90%

+8.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.94%

24.50%

+11.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.02%

24.95%

+11.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.25%

23.60%

+10.65%

FTXL vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FTXL and CIBR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

FTXL vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than CIBR's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.45%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
0.12%0.28%0.54%0.60%0.89%0.25%0.48%0.92%0.71%0.47%0.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTXL and CIBR have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to CIBR (10.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXL dropped -43.87% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs 16.28% for CIBR. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, CIBR has been the lower-risk option at 10.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 16.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTXL and CIBR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.12% for FTXL.

FTXL is categorized as Semiconductors, while CIBR is Technology Equities. FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index.

FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTXL and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer