PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTXH vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTXH vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXH achieves a 7.62% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 27.16% return.


FTXH

1D
2.50%
1M
3.66%
YTD
7.62%
6M
9.20%
1Y
39.54%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*

CIBR

1D
-1.06%
1M
27.98%
YTD
27.16%
6M
21.95%
1Y
25.06%
3Y*
27.82%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
18.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXH vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTXH
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF
7.62%24.15%2.98%-1.41%2.55%6.14%11.73%22.13%-9.51%19.44%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
27.16%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%50.53%28.52%1.47%18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXH and CIBR is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016

0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between FTXH and CIBR has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FTXH vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTXH
CIBR

Healthcare

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

3.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

94.0%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

FTXH
100.0%
CIBR

-

Basic Materials

FTXH

-

CIBR

-

Communication Services

FTXH

-

CIBR
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FTXH

-

CIBR

-

Consumer Defensive

FTXH

-

CIBR

-

Energy

FTXH

-

CIBR

-

Financial Services

FTXH

-

CIBR

-

Industrials

FTXH

-

CIBR
3.5%

Real Estate

FTXH

-

CIBR

-

Technology

FTXH

-

CIBR
94.0%

Utilities

FTXH

-

CIBR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTXH vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXH
FTXH Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FTXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXH Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXH Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXH vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTXHCIBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.19

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.32

1.14

+4.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.35

2.71

+12.64

FTXH vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXH Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXH and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTXHCIBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

1.03

+1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.65

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.66

-0.27

Drawdowns

FTXH vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXH drawdown since its inception was -32.11%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXH and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTXHCIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.11%

-33.89%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-21.99%

+14.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.51%

-21.99%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.51%

-33.89%

+14.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-3.84%

+3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-8.66%

+2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

9.26%

-6.68%

Volatility

FTXH vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) is 5.38%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 11.15%. This indicates that FTXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTXHCIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

11.15%

-5.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

20.93%

-8.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.14%

24.50%

-7.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

24.95%

-8.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

23.59%

-5.16%

FTXH vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FTXH and CIBR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

FTXH vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

FTXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.45%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
FTXH
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF
1.19%1.41%1.66%1.55%1.11%1.03%0.82%0.67%0.91%2.18%0.19%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTXH and CIBR have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIBR has higher volatility (11.15%) compared to FTXH (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXH dropped -32.11% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

On 5-year performance, CIBR leads with 16.03% vs 8.33% for FTXH. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, FTXH has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 16.03% return vs 8.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTXH and CIBR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

FTXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.

FTXH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. FTXH tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index.

FTXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTXH and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer