FTWO vs. XLE
Compare and contrast key facts about Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE).
FTWO and XLE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FTWO is a passively managed fund by Strive that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index. It was launched on Aug 30, 2023. XLE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Energy Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both FTWO and XLE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FTWO vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTWO vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF | 11.99% | 43.06% | 14.97% | 1.46% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 37.91% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -4.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTWO achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 37.91% return.
FTWO
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -7.25%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 15.96%
- 1Y
- 49.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 10.27%
- YTD
- 37.91%
- 6M
- 39.21%
- 1Y
- 35.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 23.99%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTWO vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTWO vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
FTWO
XLE
FTWO vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTWO | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.22 | 1.42 | +0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.83 | 1.84 | +1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.28 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 1.96 | +1.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.61 | 5.16 | +10.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTWO | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 1.42 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 0.32 | +1.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTWO and XLE is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FTWO vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
FTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than XLE's 2.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF | 1.00% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.44% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Drawdowns
FTWO vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTWO drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTWO and XLE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTWO | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -71.26% | +53.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.63% | -18.79% | +5.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.30% | -2.08% | -6.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -18.05% | +14.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 7.14% | -3.93% |
Volatility
FTWO vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 5.05%. This indicates that FTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTWO | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | 5.05% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.80% | 13.94% | +0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.54% | 24.93% | -2.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 26.06% | -6.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 29.48% | -10.23% |