FTSM vs. CIBR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTSM (First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTSM is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by First Trust, while CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. FTSM is actively managed, while CIBR is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTSM returned 2.54%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTSM charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.

Performance

FTSM vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTSM achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FTSM has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 2.54%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.49% annualized return.

FTSM

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.77%
• 1Y: 4.16%
• 3Y*: 4.84%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: 2.54%

CIBR

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: 31.43%
• YTD: 28.52%
• 6M: 24.03%
• 1Y: 25.78%
• 3Y*: 28.32%
• 5Y*: 16.28%
• 10Y*: 18.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTSM vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF	1.43%	4.66%	5.22%	5.12%	1.02%	-0.01%	1.12%	2.82%	1.94%	1.57%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	28.52%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	50.53%	28.52%	1.47%	18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FTSM and CIBR is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015	0.02

FTSM vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTSM	CIBR
Real Estate	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	3.5%
Technology	-	94.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FTSM vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTSM

FTSM Risk / Return Rank: 99
FTSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Martin Ratio Rank: 99

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 26
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTSM vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTSM	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	8.78	1.06	+7.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	20.68	1.56	+19.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	4.37	1.20	+3.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	35.73	1.18	+34.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	177.67	2.79	+174.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTSM vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTSM Sharpe Ratio is 8.78, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTSM and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTSM	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.78	1.06	+7.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	7.02	0.66	+6.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	2.89	0.79	+2.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.96	0.67	+1.29

Drawdowns

FTSM vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTSM drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSM and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTSM	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.12%	-33.89%	+29.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.12%	-21.99%	+21.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.15%	-21.99%	+21.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.65%	-33.89%	+33.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-4.12%	-33.89%	+29.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	-2.81%	+2.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.22%	-8.66%	+8.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	9.25%	-9.23%

Volatility

FTSM vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) is 0.16%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that FTSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTSM	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.16%	10.90%	-10.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.35%	20.90%	-20.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48%	24.50%	-24.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.49%	24.95%	-24.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.88%	23.60%	-22.72%

FTSM vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTSM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTSM vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

FTSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.45%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF	4.16%	4.28%	4.91%	4.62%	1.62%	0.39%	1.20%	2.38%	2.14%	1.49%	1.03%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTSM and CIBR in my portfolio?

FTSM and CIBR have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTSM or CIBR?

CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to FTSM (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTSM dropped -4.12% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, FTSM or CIBR?

On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 18.49% vs 2.54% for FTSM. On fees, FTSM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, FTSM has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTSM or CIBR?

Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 2.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTSM or CIBR?

FTSM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTSM or CIBR?

FTSM has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.

What is the main difference between FTSM and CIBR?

FTSM is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CIBR is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for FTSM and 0.60% for CIBR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.78 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.