FTSL vs. CIBR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FTSL (First Trust Senior Loan Fund) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTSL is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. FTSL is actively managed, while CIBR is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTSL returned 4.44%/yr vs 18.34%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTSL charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.

Performance

FTSL vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTSL achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 27.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FTSL has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 4.44%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.34% annualized return.

FTSL

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.65%
• 6M: 0.98%
• 1Y: 4.56%
• 3Y*: 7.36%
• 5Y*: 5.02%
• 10Y*: 4.44%

CIBR

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 27.98%
• YTD: 27.16%
• 6M: 21.95%
• 1Y: 25.06%
• 3Y*: 27.82%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: 18.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTSL vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund	0.65%	5.98%	8.27%	11.58%	-2.50%	3.94%	2.99%	10.11%	-1.30%	2.59%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	27.16%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	50.53%	28.52%	1.47%	18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FTSL and CIBR is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015	0.32

The correlation between FTSL and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTSL vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTSL	CIBR
Basic Materials	100.0%	-
Communication Services	-	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	3.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	94.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FTSL vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTSL

FTSL Risk / Return Rank: 63
FTSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FTSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FTSL Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FTSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FTSL Martin Ratio Rank: 45

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 27
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTSL vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTSL	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	1.03	+1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	1.53	+1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.19	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	1.14	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.30	2.71	+4.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTSL vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTSL Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTSL and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTSL	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	1.03	+1.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.51	0.65	+0.86
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	0.78	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.66	+0.19

Drawdowns

FTSL vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTSL drawdown since its inception was -22.67%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSL and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTSL	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.67%	-33.89%	+11.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.33%	-21.99%	+19.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.66%	-21.99%	+19.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.96%	-33.89%	+26.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.67%	-33.89%	+11.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.84%	+3.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.76%	-8.66%	+7.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.63%	9.26%	-8.63%

Volatility

FTSL vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) is 0.36%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 11.15%. This indicates that FTSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTSL	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.36%	11.15%	-10.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.95%	20.93%	-18.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11%	24.50%	-22.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.35%	24.95%	-21.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.18%	23.59%	-18.41%

FTSL vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTSL has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTSL vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

FTSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.45%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund	6.46%	6.59%	7.56%	7.59%	4.77%	3.17%	3.48%	4.44%	4.29%	3.64%	3.70%	3.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTSL and CIBR in my portfolio?

FTSL and CIBR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTSL or CIBR?

CIBR has higher volatility (11.15%) compared to FTSL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTSL dropped -22.67% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, FTSL or CIBR?

On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 18.34% vs 4.44% for FTSL. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTSL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTSL or CIBR?

Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 18.34% return vs 4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTSL or CIBR?

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for FTSL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTSL or CIBR?

FTSL has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.

What is the main difference between FTSL and CIBR?

FTSL is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for FTSL and 0.60% for CIBR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.