FTS-PH.TO vs. PDIV.TO
FTS-PH.TO (Fortis Inc.) is a stock, while PDIV.TO (Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF) is Dividend fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Over the past 10 years, FTS-PH.TO returned 7.80%/yr vs 9.09%/yr for PDIV.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FTS-PH.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTS-PH.TO achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly lower than PDIV.TO's 9.98% return. Over the past 10 years, FTS-PH.TO has underperformed PDIV.TO with an annualized return of 7.80%, while PDIV.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.09% annualized return.
FTS-PH.TO
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 18.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
PDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 8.83%
- YTD
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 20.05%
- 3Y*
- 12.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
FTS-PH.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTS-PH.TO Fortis Inc. | 9.03% | 20.68% | 29.63% | 10.82% | -25.81% | 57.73% | -13.39% | -6.17% | -13.55% | 32.24% |
PDIV.TO Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF | 9.98% | 14.66% | 10.71% | 4.64% | -4.39% | 20.18% | -1.15% | 23.57% | -15.24% | 26.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTS-PH.TO and PDIV.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2013 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTS-PH.TO vs. PDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FTS-PH.TO
PDIV.TO
FTS-PH.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortis Inc. (FTS-PH.TO) and Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTS-PH.TO | PDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.60 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 3.82 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.86 | 16.66 | -4.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTS-PH.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTS-PH.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.23%, which is greater than PDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTS-PH.TO and PDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTS-PH.TO | PDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.23% | -30.64% | -25.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.41% | -5.27% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.64% | -8.82% | -6.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.79% | -15.93% | -17.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.44% | -30.64% | -21.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | 0.00% | -4.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.77% | -4.33% | -13.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 1.21% | +0.34% |
Volatility
FTS-PH.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Fortis Inc. (FTS-PH.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) at 1.42%. This indicates that FTS-PH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTS-PH.TO | PDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.25% | 1.42% | +1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.43% | 5.50% | +2.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.91% | 6.89% | +4.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 10.06% | +7.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 13.91% | +7.30% |
Dividends
FTS-PH.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
FTS-PH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, less than PDIV.TO's 11.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTS-PH.TO Fortis Inc. | 5.17% | 3.96% | 2.79% | 3.51% | 3.75% | 2.70% | 4.88% | 4.63% | 4.15% | 3.46% | 4.41% | 7.57% |
PDIV.TO Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF | 11.66% | 11.23% | 12.35% | 11.84% | 6.38% | 5.59% | 6.33% | 5.85% | 6.80% | 25.71% | 5.38% | 8.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTS-PH.TO and PDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FTS-PH.TO and PDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer