FTS-PH.TO vs. BRKY.NEO
FTS-PH.TO (Fortis Inc.) is a stock, while BRKY.NEO (Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Over the past 3 years, FTS-PH.TO returned 25.29%/yr vs 14.17%/yr for BRKY.NEO. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FTS-PH.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTS-PH.TO achieves a 13.40% return, which is significantly higher than BRKY.NEO's -6.22% return.
FTS-PH.TO
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 13.40%
- 6M
- 13.46%
- 1Y
- 26.06%
- 3Y*
- 25.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
BRKY.NEO
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- -6.22%
- 6M
- -5.94%
- 1Y
- -5.33%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTS-PH.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTS-PH.TO Fortis Inc. | 13.40% | 20.68% | 29.63% | 10.82% | -0.65% |
BRKY.NEO Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF | -6.22% | 9.35% | 34.35% | 15.68% | 2.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTS-PH.TO and BRKY.NEO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2022 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTS-PH.TO vs. BRKY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
FTS-PH.TO
BRKY.NEO
FTS-PH.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortis Inc. (FTS-PH.TO) and Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF (BRKY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTS-PH.TO | BRKY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 0.95 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.84 | -0.51 | +9.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.54 | -1.07 | +25.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTS-PH.TO | BRKY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | -0.35 | +2.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.86 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
FTS-PH.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTS-PH.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.68%, which is greater than BRKY.NEO's maximum drawdown of -17.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTS-PH.TO and BRKY.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTS-PH.TO | BRKY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.68% | -17.43% | -39.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.96% | -10.55% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.64% | -17.43% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -15.05% | +13.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.41% | -5.63% | -11.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 5.00% | -3.89% |
Volatility
FTS-PH.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fortis Inc. (FTS-PH.TO) is 2.73%, while Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF (BRKY.NEO) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that FTS-PH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRKY.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTS-PH.TO | BRKY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 3.54% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.47% | 11.60% | -3.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.17% | 15.23% | -4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 17.77% | -0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 17.77% | +3.52% |
Dividends
FTS-PH.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Dividend Comparison
FTS-PH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than BRKY.NEO's 7.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKY.NEO Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 7.55% | 5.58% | 11.30% | 5.40% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTS-PH.TO Fortis Inc. | 4.98% | 3.96% | 2.79% | 3.51% | 3.75% | 2.70% | 4.88% | 4.63% | 4.15% | 3.46% | 4.41% | 5.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTS-PH.TO and BRKY.NEO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FTS-PH.TO and BRKY.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer