PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTS-PH.TO vs. PGIC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FTS-PH.TO vs. PGIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fortis Inc. (FTS-PH.TO) and Premium Global Income Split Corp. (PGIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTS-PH.TO achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly lower than PGIC.TO's 25.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FTS-PH.TO has outperformed PGIC.TO with an annualized return of 8.57%, while PGIC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower -11.90% annualized return.


FTS-PH.TO

1D
0.05%
1M
3.82%
YTD
13.35%
6M
11.41%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
25.27%
5Y*
10.53%
10Y*
8.57%

PGIC.TO

1D
-1.32%
1M
5.75%
YTD
25.23%
6M
27.04%
1Y
44.28%
3Y*
-15.75%
5Y*
-27.14%
10Y*
-11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTS-PH.TO vs. PGIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTS-PH.TO
Fortis Inc.
13.35%20.68%29.63%10.82%-25.81%57.73%-13.39%-6.17%-13.55%32.24%
PGIC.TO
Premium Global Income Split Corp.
25.23%4.88%-50.62%-48.37%-36.55%65.71%-42.95%57.27%-51.86%14.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FTS-PH.TO and PGIC.TO is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2010

0.06

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTS-PH.TO vs. PGIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTS-PH.TO
FTS-PH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FTS-PH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTS-PH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTS-PH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FTS-PH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTS-PH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

PGIC.TO
PGIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PGIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PGIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTS-PH.TO vs. PGIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortis Inc. (FTS-PH.TO) and Premium Global Income Split Corp. (PGIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTS-PH.TOPGIC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.51

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.38

9.42

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.14

28.91

-3.77

FTS-PH.TO vs. PGIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTS-PH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the PGIC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTS-PH.TO and PGIC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTS-PH.TOPGIC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.98

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

-0.32

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

-0.13

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

-0.16

+0.32

Drawdowns

FTS-PH.TO vs. PGIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTS-PH.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.68%, smaller than the maximum PGIC.TO drawdown of -97.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTS-PH.TO and PGIC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTS-PH.TOPGIC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.68%

-97.73%

+41.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.96%

-4.73%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.64%

-84.94%

+69.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.79%

-89.13%

+55.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.44%

-92.49%

+40.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-96.28%

+95.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.41%

-71.46%

+54.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

1.54%

-0.44%

Volatility

FTS-PH.TO vs. PGIC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fortis Inc. (FTS-PH.TO) is 2.75%, while Premium Global Income Split Corp. (PGIC.TO) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that FTS-PH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTS-PH.TOPGIC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

6.74%

-3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

12.02%

-3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.17%

14.98%

-3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.70%

85.07%

-67.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.30%

93.27%

-71.97%

Dividends

FTS-PH.TO vs. PGIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

FTS-PH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than PGIC.TO's 12.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTS-PH.TO
Fortis Inc.
4.98%3.96%2.79%3.51%3.75%2.70%4.88%4.63%4.15%3.46%4.41%5.76%
PGIC.TO
Premium Global Income Split Corp.
12.89%15.21%6.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.47%4.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FTS-PH.TO vs. PGIC.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortis Inc. and Premium Global Income Split Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


(FTS-PH.TO) Total Revenue
(PGIC.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FTS-PH.TO and PGIC.TO have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTS-PH.TO and PGIC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer