FTS-PH.TO vs. ETHY.TO
FTS-PH.TO (Fortis Inc.) is a stock, while ETHY.TO (Purpose Ether Yield ETF - ETF Units) is Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Over the past 3 years, FTS-PH.TO returned 25.27%/yr vs -8.68%/yr for ETHY.TO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FTS-PH.TO vs. ETHY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTS-PH.TO achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly higher than ETHY.TO's -45.70% return.
FTS-PH.TO
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 27.67%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.57%
ETHY.TO
- 1D
- -6.57%
- 1M
- -27.49%
- YTD
- -45.70%
- 6M
- -48.19%
- 1Y
- -39.18%
- 3Y*
- -8.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTS-PH.TO vs. ETHY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTS-PH.TO Fortis Inc. | 13.35% | 20.68% | 29.63% | 10.82% | -25.81% | 1.74% |
ETHY.TO Purpose Ether Yield ETF - ETF Units | -45.70% | -16.16% | 41.02% | 71.08% | -67.53% | -16.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTS-PH.TO and ETHY.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2021 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTS-PH.TO vs. ETHY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FTS-PH.TO
ETHY.TO
FTS-PH.TO vs. ETHY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortis Inc. (FTS-PH.TO) and Purpose Ether Yield ETF - ETF Units (ETHY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTS-PH.TO | ETHY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 0.94 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.38 | -0.60 | +9.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.14 | -1.03 | +26.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTS-PH.TO | ETHY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | -0.57 | +3.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | -0.36 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
FTS-PH.TO vs. ETHY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTS-PH.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.68%, smaller than the maximum ETHY.TO drawdown of -76.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTS-PH.TO and ETHY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTS-PH.TO | ETHY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.68% | -76.84% | +20.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.96% | -65.28% | +62.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.64% | -65.28% | +49.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -70.37% | +69.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.41% | -51.41% | +34.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 38.00% | -36.90% |
Volatility
FTS-PH.TO vs. ETHY.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fortis Inc. (FTS-PH.TO) is 2.75%, while Purpose Ether Yield ETF - ETF Units (ETHY.TO) has a volatility of 12.87%. This indicates that FTS-PH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTS-PH.TO | ETHY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 12.87% | -10.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 51.96% | -43.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.17% | 69.09% | -57.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 65.26% | -47.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.30% | 65.26% | -43.96% |
Dividends
FTS-PH.TO vs. ETHY.TO - Dividend Comparison
FTS-PH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than ETHY.TO's 43.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHY.TO Purpose Ether Yield ETF - ETF Units | 43.12% | 19.33% | 21.43% | 10.44% | 26.10% | 2.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTS-PH.TO Fortis Inc. | 4.98% | 3.96% | 2.79% | 3.51% | 3.75% | 2.70% | 4.88% | 4.63% | 4.15% | 3.46% | 4.41% | 5.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTS-PH.TO and ETHY.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FTS-PH.TO and ETHY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer