PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDIV.TO vs. SPYI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDIV.TO vs. SPYI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PDIV.TO is traded in CAD, while SPYI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPYI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDIV.TO achieves a 7.12% return, which is significantly lower than SPYI's 9.09% return.


PDIV.TO

1D
-0.52%
1M
2.70%
YTD
7.12%
6M
7.91%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
11.94%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
9.28%

SPYI

1D
-0.09%
1M
5.78%
YTD
9.09%
6M
7.95%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDIV.TO vs. SPYI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF
7.12%15.82%10.71%4.64%-1.56%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
9.09%11.32%29.26%15.49%0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PDIV.TO and SPYI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2022

0.43

PDIV.TO vs. SPYI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PDIV.TO
SPYI

Financial Services

31.6%
11.8%

Energy

18.2%
3.5%

Technology

12.6%
35.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
10.1%

Healthcare

6.5%
8.5%

Industrials

5.9%
8.4%

Basic Materials

5.0%
1.8%

Utilities

4.5%
2.3%

Communication Services

4.0%
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
4.9%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Financial Services

PDIV.TO
31.6%
SPYI
11.8%

Energy

PDIV.TO
18.2%
SPYI
3.5%

Technology

PDIV.TO
12.6%
SPYI
35.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PDIV.TO
7.8%
SPYI
10.1%

Healthcare

PDIV.TO
6.5%
SPYI
8.5%

Industrials

PDIV.TO
5.9%
SPYI
8.4%

Basic Materials

PDIV.TO
5.0%
SPYI
1.8%

Utilities

PDIV.TO
4.5%
SPYI
2.3%

Communication Services

PDIV.TO
4.0%
SPYI
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

PDIV.TO
3.9%
SPYI
4.9%

Real Estate

PDIV.TO

-

SPYI
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDIV.TO vs. SPYI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDIV.TO
PDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYI
SPYI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SPYI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYI Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYI Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDIV.TO vs. SPYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDIV.TOSPYIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.49

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

3.52

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.98

14.63

+1.34

PDIV.TO vs. SPYI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the SPYI Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDIV.TO and SPYI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDIV.TOSPYIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78

2.50

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.46

-0.84

Drawdowns

PDIV.TO vs. SPYI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.64%, which is greater than SPYI's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDIV.TO and SPYI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDIV.TOSPYIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.64%

-16.50%

-14.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.22%

-6.95%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.61%

-16.50%

+7.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-0.09%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-1.70%

-2.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

1.67%

-0.49%

Volatility

PDIV.TO vs. SPYI - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.43% compared to NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) at 1.79%. This indicates that PDIV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDIV.TOSPYIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

1.79%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.36%

7.52%

-2.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.79%

9.80%

-3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.87%

11.99%

-2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.89%

11.99%

+1.90%

PDIV.TO vs. SPYI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDIV.TO has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDIV.TO vs. SPYI - Dividend Comparison

PDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.85%, more than SPYI's 11.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF
11.85%12.24%12.35%11.84%6.38%5.59%6.33%5.85%6.80%25.71%5.38%8.10%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
11.64%11.70%12.04%12.01%4.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDIV.TO and SPYI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for PDIV.TO.

PDIV.TO is categorized as Dividend, while SPYI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for PDIV.TO and 0.68% for SPYI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDIV.TO and SPYI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer