FTQI vs. CIBR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FTQI (First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTQI returned 8.00%/yr vs 18.34%/yr for CIBR. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTQI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.

Performance

FTQI vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTQI achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 27.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FTQI has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 8.00%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.34% annualized return.

FTQI

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 4.05%
• YTD: 11.03%
• 6M: 11.53%
• 1Y: 28.07%
• 3Y*: 17.30%
• 5Y*: 10.97%
• 10Y*: 8.00%

CIBR

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 27.98%
• YTD: 27.16%
• 6M: 21.95%
• 1Y: 25.06%
• 3Y*: 27.82%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: 18.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTQI vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF	11.03%	12.68%	18.30%	23.63%	-8.77%	10.46%	-6.54%	13.98%	-9.78%	12.47%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	27.16%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	50.53%	28.52%	1.47%	18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FTQI and CIBR is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015	0.52

The correlation between FTQI and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.66 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTQI vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTQI	CIBR
Technology	35.5%	94.0%
Financial Services	13.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	-
Healthcare	8.4%	-
Energy	7.4%	-
Industrials	7.4%	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.9%	-
Basic Materials	3.9%	-
Utilities	3.9%	-
Communication Services	3.4%	2.6%
Real Estate	2.0%	-

Return for Risk

FTQI vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTQI

FTQI Risk / Return Rank: 86
FTQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FTQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FTQI Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FTQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FTQI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 27
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTQI vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTQI	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	1.03	+1.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.76	1.53	+2.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.19	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.52	1.14	+3.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.94	2.71	+19.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTQI vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTQI Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTQI and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTQI	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	1.03	+1.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.65	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.78	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.66	-0.14

Drawdowns

FTQI vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTQI drawdown since its inception was -19.42%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTQI and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTQI	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.42%	-33.89%	+14.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.24%	-21.99%	+15.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.42%	-21.99%	+2.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.42%	-33.89%	+14.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.42%	-33.89%	+14.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.84%	+3.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-8.66%	+4.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.28%	9.26%	-7.98%

Volatility

FTQI vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) is 1.66%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 11.15%. This indicates that FTQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTQI	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.66%	11.15%	-9.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.24%	20.93%	-12.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.33%	24.50%	-14.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.81%	24.95%	-10.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.35%	23.59%	-10.24%

FTQI vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTQI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTQI vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

FTQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.94%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.45%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF	10.94%	11.46%	11.66%	11.49%	9.85%	3.05%	3.27%	2.95%	3.27%	2.74%	3.02%	3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTQI and CIBR in my portfolio?

FTQI and CIBR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTQI or CIBR?

CIBR has higher volatility (11.15%) compared to FTQI (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTQI dropped -19.42% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, FTQI or CIBR?

On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 18.34% vs 8.00% for FTQI. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTQI has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTQI or CIBR?

Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 18.34% return vs 8.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTQI or CIBR?

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTQI or CIBR?

FTQI has the higher dividend yield at 10.94%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.

What is the main difference between FTQI and CIBR?

FTQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. FTQI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FTQI and 0.60% for CIBR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.