FTPA vs. FLCH

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FTPA (Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTPA is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. FTPA is actively managed, while FLCH is passively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTPA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.

Performance

FTPA vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF (FTPA) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTPA achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -8.95% return.

FTPA

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 2.33%
• 6M: 2.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLCH

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: -7.63%
• YTD: -8.95%
• 6M: -11.33%
• 1Y: 2.76%
• 3Y*: 9.12%
• 5Y*: -5.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTPA vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTPA Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF	2.33%	0.24%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-8.95%	-5.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FTPA and FLCH is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025	0.16

Return for Risk

FTPA vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 11
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTPA vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF (FTPA) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTPA	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.14	0.01	+1.13

Drawdowns

FTPA vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTPA drawdown since its inception was -2.96%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTPA and FLCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTPA	FLCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.96%	-62.09%	+59.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.64%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.43%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-35.82%	+35.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.65%	-30.53%	+29.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTPA	FLCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.87%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.08%	19.27%	-15.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.08%	29.60%	-25.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.08%	27.91%	-23.83%

FTPA vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTPA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTPA vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

FTPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than FLCH's 2.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.59%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%
FTPA Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF	2.08%	0.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTPA and FLCH in my portfolio?

FTPA and FLCH have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTPA or FLCH?

On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTPA or FLCH?

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTPA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTPA or FLCH?

FLCH has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 2.08% for FTPA.

What is the main difference between FTPA and FLCH?

FTPA is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FLCH is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTPA and 0.19% for FLCH.