FTOH vs. UGA
FTOH (Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - FTOH is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Actively Managed, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. FTOH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
FTOH vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTOH achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 65.95% return.
FTOH
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -11.11%
- YTD
- 65.95%
- 6M
- 62.61%
- 1Y
- 52.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.40%
- 5Y*
- 23.05%
- 10Y*
- 14.44%
FTOH vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTOH Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF | 2.43% | 0.08% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 65.95% | -8.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTOH and UGA is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTOH vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
FTOH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UGA
FTOH vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF (FTOH) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTOH | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTOH vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTOH drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTOH and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTOH | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -86.59% | +84.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -17.12% | +17.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.53% | -36.70% | +36.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.05% | — |
Volatility
FTOH vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTOH | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.58% | 35.27% | -31.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.58% | 34.45% | -30.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.58% | 37.25% | -33.67% |
FTOH vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTOH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTOH vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
FTOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FTOH Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF | 2.17% | 0.56% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTOH and UGA have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTOH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTOH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
FTOH has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
FTOH is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while UGA is Oil & Gas. FTOH tracks Actively Managed, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTOH and 0.75% for UGA.
Find the right allocation for FTOH and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer