FTNY vs. LVHD
FTNY (Franklin New York Municipal Income ETF) and LVHD (Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTNY is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while LVHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. FTNY is actively managed, while LVHD is passively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTNY charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for LVHD.
Performance
FTNY vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTNY achieves a 3.17% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 13.03% return.
FTNY
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 3.17%
- 6M
- 3.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LVHD
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 13.03%
- 6M
- 12.46%
- 1Y
- 16.96%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.77%
- 10Y*
- 8.58%
FTNY vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTNY Franklin New York Municipal Income ETF | 3.17% | -0.24% |
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 13.03% | -1.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTNY and LVHD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTNY vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank
FTNY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LVHD
FTNY vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin New York Municipal Income ETF (FTNY) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTNY | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTNY vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTNY drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, smaller than the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTNY and LVHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTNY | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -37.32% | +34.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -4.03% | +3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.48% | — |
Volatility
FTNY vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTNY | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.95% | 9.91% | -5.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.95% | 12.92% | -8.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.95% | 15.53% | -11.58% |
FTNY vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTNY has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTNY vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison
FTNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than LVHD's 3.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTNY Franklin New York Municipal Income ETF | 2.23% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 3.21% | 3.35% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTNY and LVHD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FTNY.
LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 2.23% for FTNY.
FTNY is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while LVHD is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FTNY and 0.27% for LVHD.
Find the right allocation for FTNY and LVHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer