FTMH vs. FLKR
FTMH (Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTMH is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. FTMH is actively managed, while FLKR is passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.
Performance
FTMH vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMH achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 104.96% return.
FTMH
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 3.65%
- 6M
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLKR
- 1D
- -4.41%
- 1M
- 16.33%
- YTD
- 104.96%
- 6M
- 121.64%
- 1Y
- 213.10%
- 3Y*
- 48.97%
- 5Y*
- 18.41%
- 10Y*
- —
FTMH vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF | 3.65% | 0.11% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 104.96% | 5.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMH and FLKR is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMH vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
FTMH
FLKR
FTMH vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTMH | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | 0.53 | +1.07 |
Drawdowns
FTMH vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMH drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMH and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMH | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -50.06% | +46.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.10% | +6.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -22.06% | +21.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.21% | — |
Volatility
FTMH vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMH | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.99% | 41.48% | -37.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 28.25% | -24.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 27.60% | -23.61% |
FTMH vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTMH vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
FTMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than FLKR's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 1.89% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% |
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF | 2.71% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMH and FLKR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTMH.
FTMH has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 1.89% for FLKR.
FTMH is categorized as High Yield Muni, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMH and 0.09% for FLKR.
Find the right allocation for FTMH and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer