FTLF vs. STRL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FTLF (FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock) and STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) are both stocks. FTLF operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while STRL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, FTLF returned 50.85%/yr vs 68.62%/yr for STRL. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FTLF vs. STRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTLF achieves a -33.44% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 204.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FTLF has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of 50.85%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 68.62% annualized return.

FTLF

• 1D: -3.90%
• 1M: 7.55%
• YTD: -33.44%
• 6M: -36.18%
• 1Y: -18.69%
• 3Y*: 8.07%
• 5Y*: 17.92%
• 10Y*: 50.85%

STRL

• 1D: 8.22%
• 1M: 27.26%
• YTD: 204.59%
• 6M: 197.97%
• 1Y: 327.93%
• 3Y*: 160.79%
• 5Y*: 111.75%
• 10Y*: 68.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTLF vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTLF FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock	-33.44%	-0.18%	70.68%	19.75%	-0.31%	196.30%	53.19%	3,182.89%	78.96%	-74.74%
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.	204.59%	81.79%	91.57%	168.08%	24.71%	41.32%	32.17%	29.29%	-33.11%	92.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FTLF and STRL is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2007	0.05

Fundamentals

EPS FTLF : $0.68 STRL : $11.19
PE Ratio FTLF : 16.00 STRL : 83.36
PEG Ratio FTLF : 1.76 STRL : 1.77
PS Ratio FTLF : 1.53 STRL : 10.02
Total Revenue (TTM) FTLF : $70.56M STRL : $2.88B
Gross Profit (TTM) FTLF : $28.73M STRL : $664.66M
EBITDA (TTM) FTLF : $11.02M STRL : $429.99M

Return for Risk

FTLF vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTLF

FTLF Risk / Return Rank: 28
FTLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FTLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FTLF Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FTLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FTLF Martin Ratio Rank: 30

STRL

STRL Risk / Return Rank: 97
STRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
STRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
STRL Omega Ratio Rank: 95
STRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
STRL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTLF vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTLF	STRL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.35	4.00	-4.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.19	4.09	-4.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.54	-0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.33	10.65	-10.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.64	28.84	-29.48

FTLF vs. STRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTLF Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the STRL Sharpe Ratio of 4.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTLF and STRL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTLF vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTLF drawdown since its inception was -99.68%, which is greater than STRL's maximum drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLF and STRL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTLF	STRL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.68%	-92.51%	-7.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.23%	-31.02%	-26.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.23%	-47.67%	-9.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.23%	-47.67%	-9.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.06%	-59.60%	-29.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.83%	-6.14%	-41.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.86%	-46.26%	-24.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.12%	11.44%	+17.68%

Volatility

FTLF vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) is 20.08%, while Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 25.27%. This indicates that FTLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTLF	STRL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.08%	25.27%	-5.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.15%	63.92%	-24.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.09%	82.74%	-29.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.72%	57.39%	-11.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	305.94%	53.64%	+252.30%

Dividends

FTLF vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison

Neither FTLF nor STRL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTLF and STRL in my portfolio?

FTLF and STRL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTLF or STRL?

STRL has higher volatility (25.27%) compared to FTLF (20.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTLF dropped -99.68% vs STRL's -92.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.