PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTINX vs. FASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTINX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class I (FTINX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTINX achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FTINX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 5.63%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.01% annualized return.


FTINX

1D
0.30%
1M
2.20%
YTD
6.02%
6M
6.45%
1Y
14.65%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
5.63%

FASGX

1D
0.51%
1M
4.40%
YTD
11.93%
6M
12.90%
1Y
26.54%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTINX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTINX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class I
6.02%11.24%6.22%9.83%-12.35%6.08%10.95%13.43%-2.99%8.97%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
11.93%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FTINX and FASGX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2007

0.93

The correlation between FTINX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTINX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTINX
FTINX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FTINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FTINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTINX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTINX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class I (FTINX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTINXFASGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.49

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

3.39

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.98

14.98

0.00

FTINX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTINX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTINXFASGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.61

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.69

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.79

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.63

+0.13

Drawdowns

FTINX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTINX drawdown since its inception was -26.30%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTINX and FASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTINXFASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.30%

-47.35%

+21.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.32%

-7.95%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.95%

-12.80%

+6.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.58%

-23.54%

+6.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.58%

-27.20%

+10.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.09%

-6.71%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.79%

-0.80%

Volatility

FTINX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class I (FTINX) is 1.98%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that FTINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTINXFASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

3.30%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.47%

8.39%

-3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.43%

10.34%

-4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.50%

12.27%

-5.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.18%

12.65%

-6.47%

FTINX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTINX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTINX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

FTINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than FASGX's 6.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.55%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%
FTINX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class I
2.71%2.78%3.03%2.73%4.85%1.84%2.22%3.20%3.78%2.74%1.57%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FTINX and FASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FASGX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to FTINX (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTINX dropped -26.30% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

FTINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTINX and FASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer