FTINX vs. BNDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class I (FTINX) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX).
FTINX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 9, 2007. BNDX is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged). It was launched on May 31, 2013.
Performance
FTINX vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTINX vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTINX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class I | -1.08% | 11.24% | 6.22% | 9.83% | -12.35% | 6.08% | 10.95% | 13.43% | -2.99% | 8.97% |
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | -0.13% | 2.86% | 3.57% | 8.77% | -12.76% | -2.29% | 4.65% | 7.87% | 2.81% | 2.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTINX achieves a -1.08% return, which is significantly lower than BNDX's -0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FTINX has outperformed BNDX with an annualized return of 5.09%, while BNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.73% annualized return.
FTINX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- YTD
- -1.08%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 9.34%
- 3Y*
- 7.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.57%
- 10Y*
- 5.09%
BNDX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- 3.83%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- 1.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTINX vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTINX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTINX vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank
FTINX
BNDX
FTINX vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class I (FTINX) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTINX | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 0.88 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.10 | 1.23 | +0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.16 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 0.96 | +1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.19 | 3.94 | +4.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTINX | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 0.88 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.04 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.43 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.60 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTINX and BNDX is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FTINX vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison
FTINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than BNDX's 4.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTINX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class I | 2.95% | 2.78% | 3.03% | 2.73% | 4.85% | 1.84% | 2.22% | 3.20% | 3.78% | 2.74% | 1.57% | 3.49% |
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 4.45% | 4.39% | 4.18% | 4.42% | 1.51% | 3.74% | 1.11% | 3.40% | 3.01% | 2.23% | 1.89% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
FTINX vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTINX drawdown since its inception was -26.30%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTINX and BNDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTINX | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.30% | -16.23% | -10.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.56% | -2.93% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.58% | -15.86% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.58% | -16.23% | -0.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.25% | -2.14% | -2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -3.10% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 0.71% | +0.40% |
Volatility
FTINX vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class I (FTINX) has a higher volatility of 2.52% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) at 1.73%. This indicates that FTINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTINX | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 1.73% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.98% | 2.28% | +1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.27% | 3.21% | +3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.42% | 4.81% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 4.05% | +2.07% |