FTI vs. RSI
FTI (TechnipFMC plc) and RSI (Rush Street Interactive, Inc.) are both stocks. FTI operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while RSI operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, FTI returned 50.06%/yr vs 18.35%/yr for RSI. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FTI vs. RSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTI achieves a 46.47% return, which is significantly lower than RSI's 49.72% return.
FTI
- 1D
- -2.75%
- 1M
- -8.20%
- YTD
- 46.47%
- 6M
- 45.94%
- 1Y
- 86.16%
- 3Y*
- 65.31%
- 5Y*
- 50.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
RSI
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- 7.50%
- YTD
- 49.72%
- 6M
- 49.18%
- 1Y
- 110.19%
- 3Y*
- 110.47%
- 5Y*
- 18.35%
- 10Y*
- —
FTI vs. RSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 46.47% | 54.90% | 44.78% | 66.07% | 105.91% | -15.36% | 13.80% |
RSI Rush Street Interactive, Inc. | 49.72% | 41.62% | 205.57% | 25.07% | -78.24% | -23.79% | 125.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTI and RSI is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2020 | 0.22 |
The correlation between FTI and RSI shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FTI:
$26.71B
RSI:
$3.11B
FTI:
$2.59
RSI:
$0.54
FTI:
25.17
RSI:
54.15
FTI:
0.03
RSI:
0.10
FTI:
2.67
RSI:
2.36
FTI:
7.94
RSI:
19.53
FTI:
$10.19B
RSI:
$1.24B
FTI:
$2.75B
RSI:
$433.41M
FTI:
$1.13B
RSI:
$162.04M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTI vs. RSI — Risk / Return Rank
FTI
RSI
FTI vs. RSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTI | RSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.38 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.60 | 3.63 | +1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.87 | 8.29 | +8.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTI vs. RSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTI drawdown since its inception was -91.74%, roughly equal to the maximum RSI drawdown of -88.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTI and RSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTI | RSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.74% | -88.92% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.29% | -29.47% | +14.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.94% | -42.04% | +13.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.32% | -86.88% | +45.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.29% | -3.42% | -11.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.90% | -50.11% | +16.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.08% | 12.88% | -7.80% |
Volatility
FTI vs. RSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is 9.82%, while Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) has a volatility of 12.30%. This indicates that FTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTI | RSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.82% | 12.30% | -2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.99% | 32.71% | -10.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.91% | 51.65% | -19.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.42% | 61.96% | -19.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.72% | 60.55% | -12.83% |
Dividends
FTI vs. RSI - Dividend Comparison
FTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, while RSI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 0.31% | 0.45% | 0.69% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.38% | 2.43% | 2.66% | 0.42% |
RSI Rush Street Interactive, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FTI vs. RSI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TechnipFMC plc and Rush Street Interactive, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FTI vs. RSI - Profitability Comparison
FTI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a gross profit of 1.49B and revenue of 2.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.7%.
RSI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported a gross profit of 132.17M and revenue of 370.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.7%.
FTI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported an operating income of 351.00M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.
RSI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported an operating income of 42.78M and revenue of 370.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.
FTI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a net income of 260.50M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
RSI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported a net income of 26.21M and revenue of 370.36M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FTI and RSI have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSI has higher volatility (12.30%) compared to FTI (9.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTI dropped -91.74% vs RSI's -88.92%.
FTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTI and RSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer