PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTEC vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTEC vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTEC achieves a 31.89% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FTEC has outperformed VUG with an annualized return of 25.57%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively lower 18.26% annualized return.


FTEC

1D
-1.49%
1M
18.21%
YTD
31.89%
6M
30.74%
1Y
60.87%
3Y*
33.93%
5Y*
22.49%
10Y*
25.57%

VUG

1D
-1.23%
1M
6.22%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTEC vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
31.89%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.49%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FTEC and VUG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.95

The correlation between FTEC and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTEC vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTEC
VUG

Technology

98.0%
53.5%

Industrials

0.6%
3.6%

Financial Services

0.6%
4.3%

Energy

0.4%
0.4%

Communication Services

0.0%
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
12.2%

Basic Materials

-

0.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.5%

Healthcare

-

4.6%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

0.9%

Technology

FTEC
98.0%
VUG
53.5%

Industrials

FTEC
0.6%
VUG
3.6%

Financial Services

FTEC
0.6%
VUG
4.3%

Energy

FTEC
0.4%
VUG
0.4%

Communication Services

FTEC
0.0%
VUG
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FTEC
0.0%
VUG
12.2%

Basic Materials

FTEC

-

VUG
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

FTEC

-

VUG
1.5%

Healthcare

FTEC

-

VUG
4.6%

Real Estate

FTEC

-

VUG
1.0%

Utilities

FTEC

-

VUG
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTEC vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTEC vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTECVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.31

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

1.69

+2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.10

5.92

+6.17

FTEC vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTEC and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTECVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97

1.77

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.68

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

0.85

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.62

+0.37

Drawdowns

FTEC vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTEC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEC and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTECVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-50.68%

+15.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.26%

-16.53%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.30%

-22.85%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.95%

-35.61%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.95%

-35.61%

+0.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-1.51%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-7.09%

+1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

4.71%

+0.34%

Volatility

FTEC vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.83%. This indicates that FTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTECVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

3.83%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.14%

12.11%

+4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.63%

15.84%

+4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.23%

22.22%

+3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.69%

21.44%

+3.25%

FTEC vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTEC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FTEC vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.32%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FTEC and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTEC has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to VUG (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTEC dropped -34.95% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 25.57% vs 18.26% for VUG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 25.57% return vs 18.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FTEC.

VUG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.32% for FTEC.

FTEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FTEC and 0.03% for VUG.

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTEC and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer