PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTEC vs. GXPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTEC vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTEC achieves a 22.53% return, which is significantly higher than GXPT's 17.60% return.


FTEC

1D
1.71%
1M
0.31%
6M
22.49%
YTD
22.53%
1Y
37.50%
3Y*
29.49%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*
23.79%
ALL TIME*
21.60%

GXPT

1D
1.42%
1M
1.35%
6M
19.51%
YTD
17.60%
1Y
30.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
30.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$86.23M$78.73M$94.95M
$16.90M$9.50M$5.80M

FTEC vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTEC and GXPT is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

0.98

The correlation between FTEC and GXPT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTEC vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

GXPT
GXPT Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GXPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXPT Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GXPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXPT Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTEC vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTECGXPTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.23

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

1.66

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.23

4.35

+1.87

FTEC vs. GXPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the GXPT Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTEC and GXPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTEC vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTEC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEC and GXPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTECGXPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-18.74%

-16.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.26%

-18.74%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.48%

-8.14%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-5.46%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.04%

7.13%

-1.09%

Volatility

FTEC vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) at 7.76%. This indicates that FTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTECGXPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.41%

7.76%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.16%

19.32%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.30%

23.53%

+0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.89%

23.28%

+2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.99%

23.28%

+1.71%

FTEC vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTEC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FTEC vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison

FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than GXPT's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.36%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
GXPT
Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF
0.22%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FTEC and GXPT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTEC has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to GXPT (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTEC dropped -34.95% vs GXPT's -18.74%.

On 1-year performance, FTEC leads with 37.50% vs 30.95% for GXPT. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GXPT has been the lower-risk option at 7.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 37.50% return vs 30.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXPT.

FTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.22% for GXPT.

FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FTEC and 0.15% for GXPT.

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTEC and GXPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer