PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTEC vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTEC vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTEC achieves a 27.43% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 18.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FTEC has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 24.27%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.08% annualized return.


FTEC

1D
-0.37%
1M
2.77%
6M
33.06%
YTD
27.43%
1Y
41.09%
3Y*
31.20%
5Y*
19.15%
10Y*
24.27%
ALL TIME*
21.96%

FDL

1D
-0.54%
1M
4.47%
6M
5.75%
YTD
18.60%
1Y
26.71%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
13.96%
10Y*
11.08%
ALL TIME*
8.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$48.97M$49.30M$42.41M
$96.65M$85.29M$95.75M

FTEC vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
27.43%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
18.60%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FTEC and FDL is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.43

The correlation between FTEC and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTEC vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTEC
FDL

Technology

98.6%
4.3%

Communication Services

0.5%
11.2%

Financial Services

0.5%
13.7%

Industrials

0.3%
3.6%

Energy

0.3%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
4.4%

Basic Materials

0.0%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

24.3%

Healthcare

-

11.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

15.4%

Technology

FTEC
98.6%
FDL
4.3%

Communication Services

FTEC
0.5%
FDL
11.2%

Financial Services

FTEC
0.5%
FDL
13.7%

Industrials

FTEC
0.3%
FDL
3.6%

Energy

FTEC
0.3%
FDL
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FTEC
0.1%
FDL
4.4%

Basic Materials

FTEC
0.0%
FDL
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

FTEC

-

FDL
24.3%

Healthcare

FTEC

-

FDL
11.7%

Real Estate

FTEC

-

FDL

-

Utilities

FTEC

-

FDL
15.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTEC vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTEC vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTECFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

6.28

-3.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.81

14.78

-7.98

FTEC vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTEC and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTEC vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTEC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEC and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTECFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-65.93%

+30.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.26%

-4.27%

-11.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.30%

-12.24%

-15.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.95%

-16.46%

-18.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.95%

-41.40%

+6.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.83%

-1.60%

-3.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-9.59%

+4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.05%

1.81%

+4.24%

Volatility

FTEC vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 4.48%. This indicates that FTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTECFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.07%

4.48%

+4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.42%

8.63%

+11.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.54%

11.88%

+12.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.96%

14.43%

+11.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.02%

17.16%

+7.86%

FTEC vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTEC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTEC vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than FDL's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.58%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.35%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTEC and FDL have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTEC has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to FDL (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTEC dropped -34.95% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 24.27% vs 11.08% for FDL. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 24.27% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.35% for FTEC.

FTEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FTEC and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTEC and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer