FTDWX vs. FASGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FTDWX (Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class M) and FASGX (Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, FTDWX returned 3.94%/yr vs 10.31%/yr for FASGX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTDWX charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FASGX.

Performance

FTDWX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class M (FTDWX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTDWX achieves a 4.15% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FTDWX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 3.94%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.31% annualized return.

FTDWX

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.86%
• YTD: 4.15%
• 6M: 4.13%
• 1Y: 10.05%
• 3Y*: 7.28%
• 5Y*: 2.97%
• 10Y*: 3.94%

FASGX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.06%
• YTD: 11.90%
• 6M: 11.55%
• 1Y: 25.19%
• 3Y*: 16.34%
• 5Y*: 8.28%
• 10Y*: 10.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTDWX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTDWX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class M	4.15%	8.84%	4.86%	7.35%	-10.73%	3.48%	7.96%	10.06%	-2.22%	6.10%
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	11.90%	18.23%	10.81%	16.45%	-16.83%	13.98%	17.19%	22.81%	-7.65%	17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FTDWX and FASGX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2005	0.86

The correlation between FTDWX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FTDWX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTDWX

FTDWX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FTDWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FTDWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FTDWX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FTDWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FTDWX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FASGX

FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTDWX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class M (FTDWX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTDWX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	2.36	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	3.26	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.44	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.12	3.29	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.44	14.19	-0.76

FTDWX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTDWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTDWX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTDWX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTDWX drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTDWX and FASGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTDWX	FASGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.00%	-47.35%	+27.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.34%	-7.95%	+4.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.99%	-12.80%	+7.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.28%	-23.54%	+9.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.28%	-27.20%	+12.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.12%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-6.70%	+4.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.77%	1.84%	-1.07%

Volatility

FTDWX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class M (FTDWX) is 1.87%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that FTDWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTDWX	FASGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.87%	4.58%	-2.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.74%	9.28%	-5.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.44%	11.10%	-6.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.10%	12.40%	-7.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.65%	12.71%	-8.06%

FTDWX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTDWX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTDWX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

FTDWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than FASGX's 6.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	6.55%	7.33%	4.60%	1.72%	6.69%	2.73%	2.20%	5.19%	6.31%	2.75%	0.20%	5.58%
FTDWX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class M	2.56%	2.59%	2.81%	2.64%	3.99%	1.09%	1.62%	2.47%	3.51%	2.75%	1.36%	3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTDWX and FASGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FTDWX and FASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FTDWX or FASGX?

FASGX has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to FTDWX (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTDWX dropped -20.00% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.