PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTDWX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTDWX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class M (FTDWX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTDWX achieves a 4.15% return, which is significantly lower than FRGAX's 8.57% return.


FTDWX

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.86%
YTD
4.15%
6M
4.13%
1Y
10.05%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
2.97%
10Y*
3.94%

FRGAX

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.04%
YTD
8.57%
6M
8.05%
1Y
20.59%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTDWX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FTDWX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class M
4.15%8.84%4.86%7.35%0.20%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
8.57%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FTDWX and FRGAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022

0.83

The correlation between FTDWX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTDWX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTDWX
FTDWX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FTDWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTDWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTDWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FTDWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTDWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTDWX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class M (FTDWX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTDWXFRGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.42

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

3.06

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.44

13.35

+0.09

FTDWX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTDWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTDWX and FRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTDWX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTDWX drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTDWX and FRGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTDWXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.00%

-11.77%

-8.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.34%

-7.03%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.99%

-11.77%

+6.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.73%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-1.58%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

1.61%

-0.84%

Volatility

FTDWX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class M (FTDWX) is 1.87%, while Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that FTDWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTDWXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.87%

3.80%

-1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.74%

7.93%

-4.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.44%

9.62%

-5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.10%

10.41%

-5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.65%

10.41%

-5.76%

FTDWX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTDWX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTDWX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

FTDWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than FRGAX's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.85%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTDWX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class M
2.56%2.59%2.81%2.64%3.99%1.09%1.62%2.47%3.51%2.75%1.36%3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FTDWX and FRGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRGAX has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to FTDWX (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTDWX dropped -20.00% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.

FTDWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTDWX and FRGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer