FTDS vs. KNG
FTDS (First Trust Dividend Strength ETF) and KNG (FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTDS is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dividend Strength Index, while KNG is a Dividend fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTDS returned 6.32%/yr vs 4.31%/yr for KNG. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTDS charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KNG.
Performance
FTDS vs. KNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTDS achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.
FTDS
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 6.54%
- 6M
- 6.72%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.75%
KNG
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 7.44%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- —
FTDS vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTDS First Trust Dividend Strength ETF | 6.54% | 13.64% | 11.12% | 11.75% | -13.54% | 24.79% | 14.16% | 24.29% | -10.13% |
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 2.20% | 6.63% | 5.99% | 7.48% | -7.03% | 24.78% | 7.21% | 26.64% | -0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTDS and KNG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018 | 0.72 |
The correlation between FTDS and KNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.83 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTDS vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTDS
KNG
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FTDS
KNG
Energy
FTDS
KNG
Industrials
FTDS
KNG
Healthcare
FTDS
KNG
Technology
FTDS
KNG
Basic Materials
FTDS
KNG
Consumer Cyclical
FTDS
KNG
Consumer Defensive
FTDS
KNG
Communication Services
FTDS
-
KNG
-
Real Estate
FTDS
-
KNG
Utilities
FTDS
-
KNG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTDS vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank
FTDS
KNG
FTDS vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTDS | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.13 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 0.87 | +1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | 2.25 | +5.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTDS | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 0.73 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.32 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.49 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
FTDS vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTDS drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, which is greater than KNG's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTDS and KNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTDS | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.53% | -35.12% | -21.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | -8.61% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.04% | -14.24% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.35% | -18.20% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.46% | -5.89% | +1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -4.13% | -5.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 3.32% | -0.88% |
Volatility
FTDS vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that FTDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTDS | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.48% | 2.29% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 7.39% | +1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.92% | 10.19% | +2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 13.59% | +4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 17.18% | +2.96% |
FTDS vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTDS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTDS vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison
FTDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than KNG's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTDS First Trust Dividend Strength ETF | 1.66% | 1.59% | 2.05% | 2.15% | 2.31% | 0.72% | 0.99% | 1.13% | 1.14% | 0.79% | 1.24% | 0.95% |
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 8.67% | 8.61% | 9.08% | 5.91% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTDS and KNG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTDS has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTDS dropped -56.53% vs KNG's -35.12%.
On 5-year performance, FTDS leads with 6.32% vs 4.31% for KNG. On fees, FTDS is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTDS has performed better with a 6.32% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTDS is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.
KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 1.66% for FTDS.
FTDS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while KNG is Dividend. FTDS tracks Dividend Strength Index, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTDS and 0.75% for KNG.
FTDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTDS and KNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer