PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTDS vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTDS vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTDS achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.


FTDS

1D
-0.21%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
6.54%
6M
6.72%
1Y
18.40%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
10.75%

KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTDS vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FTDS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
6.54%13.64%11.12%11.75%-13.54%24.79%14.16%24.29%-10.13%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.20%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FTDS and KNG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.72

The correlation between FTDS and KNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.83 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTDS vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTDS
KNG

Financial Services

27.9%
12.7%

Energy

20.2%
3.0%

Industrials

19.8%
20.3%

Healthcare

9.4%
10.1%

Technology

9.4%
4.3%

Basic Materials

8.0%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
23.5%

Communication Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

4.4%

Utilities

-

6.1%

Financial Services

FTDS
27.9%
KNG
12.7%

Energy

FTDS
20.2%
KNG
3.0%

Industrials

FTDS
19.8%
KNG
20.3%

Healthcare

FTDS
9.4%
KNG
10.1%

Technology

FTDS
9.4%
KNG
4.3%

Basic Materials

FTDS
8.0%
KNG
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FTDS
3.4%
KNG
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

FTDS
1.9%
KNG
23.5%

Communication Services

FTDS

-

KNG

-

Real Estate

FTDS

-

KNG
4.4%

Utilities

FTDS

-

KNG
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTDS vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTDS
FTDS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FTDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTDS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FTDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTDS Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTDS vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTDSKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.13

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

0.87

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.56

2.25

+5.31

FTDS vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTDS Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTDS and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTDSKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

0.73

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.32

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.49

-0.17

Drawdowns

FTDS vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTDS drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, which is greater than KNG's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTDS and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTDSKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.53%

-35.12%

-21.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-8.61%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-14.24%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

-18.20%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.46%

-5.89%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.87%

-4.13%

-5.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

3.32%

-0.88%

Volatility

FTDS vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that FTDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTDSKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

2.29%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

7.39%

+1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.92%

10.19%

+2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.65%

13.59%

+4.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

17.18%

+2.96%

FTDS vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTDS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTDS vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

FTDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than KNG's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTDS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
1.66%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTDS and KNG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTDS has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTDS dropped -56.53% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 5-year performance, FTDS leads with 6.32% vs 4.31% for KNG. On fees, FTDS is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTDS has performed better with a 6.32% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTDS is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 1.66% for FTDS.

FTDS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while KNG is Dividend. FTDS tracks Dividend Strength Index, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTDS and 0.75% for KNG.

FTDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTDS and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer