FTCE vs. CIBR
FTCE (First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTCE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders Index, while CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FTCE returned 37.80% vs 30.75% for CIBR. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
FTCE vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTCE achieves a 14.69% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 32.24% return.
FTCE
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 10.79%
- YTD
- 14.69%
- 6M
- 15.43%
- 1Y
- 37.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 37.17%
- YTD
- 32.24%
- 6M
- 29.33%
- 1Y
- 30.75%
- 3Y*
- 29.54%
- 5Y*
- 17.20%
- 10Y*
- 18.83%
FTCE vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FTCE First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF | 14.69% | 26.14% | -0.04% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 32.24% | 13.06% | 8.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTCE and CIBR is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024 | 0.67 |
The correlation between FTCE and CIBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTCE vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTCE
CIBR
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Technology
FTCE
CIBR
Industrials
FTCE
CIBR
Financial Services
FTCE
CIBR
-
Healthcare
FTCE
CIBR
-
Utilities
FTCE
CIBR
-
Real Estate
FTCE
CIBR
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTCE
CIBR
-
Energy
FTCE
CIBR
-
Basic Materials
FTCE
CIBR
-
Consumer Defensive
FTCE
CIBR
-
Communication Services
FTCE
CIBR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTCE vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
FTCE
CIBR
FTCE vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF (FTCE) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTCE | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.91 | 1.27 | +1.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.94 | 1.82 | +2.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.23 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 1.46 | +2.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.49 | 3.47 | +11.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTCE | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91 | 1.27 | +1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.50 | 0.68 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
FTCE vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTCE drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCE and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTCE | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.11% | -33.89% | +15.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.16% | -21.99% | +11.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.50% | -8.66% | +6.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 9.25% | -6.61% |
Volatility
FTCE vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF (FTCE) is 3.33%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that FTCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTCE | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 9.99% | -6.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.16% | 20.72% | -10.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 24.34% | -11.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 24.93% | -8.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 23.58% | -6.82% |
FTCE vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FTCE and CIBR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
FTCE vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
FTCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than CIBR's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.43% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
FTCE First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF | 0.79% | 0.96% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTCE and CIBR have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to FTCE (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCE dropped -18.11% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
On 1-year performance, FTCE leads with 37.80% vs 30.75% for CIBR. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, FTCE has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FTCE has performed better with a 37.80% return vs 30.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTCE and CIBR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
FTCE has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.43% for CIBR.
FTCE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CIBR is Technology Equities. FTCE tracks Bloomberg New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index.
FTCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTCE and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer